Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona News
    • Business Profiles
    • Opinion
    • Mind & Body
    • Arts
    • Elections
    • Gift Shop
    • Contact
    • Advertise
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home » Letter to The Editor: Sedona’s financial challenges are not being met under Home Rule
    Letter to The Editor

    Letter to The Editor:
    Sedona’s financial challenges are not
    being met under Home Rule

    August 21, 20142 Comments
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp

    logo_lettereditorBy Jean Jenks, Sedona Resident
    (August 21, 2014)

    Dear Editor,

    Many citizens are aware of the so-called Sedona Lodging Council’s “Vote Yes on Home Rule” half-page advertisement (August 13th) in the local print newspaper, n’est ce pas?  It’s at odds with some facts.
           
    Sedona’s financial challenges are not being met under Home Rule.  Funding for critical capital improvement needs such as street paving and flood control is problematic.  According to Page 1-8 of the City budget: “In order to continue to address capital infrastructure improvements and pursue new capital outlay projects beyond 2017 [FY 2016-17], other funding sources and/or a debt financing strategy must be pursued.”  This startling news even though City budgets have increased from $30.7M in 2011 to $38.4M this fiscal year.  Something is wrong, here.  I believe City priorities have been mishandled.  

    With a fiscally responsible City Council, the cuts set aside “in a restricted lockbox” sans Home Rule could be utilized for street paving, flood control and sidewalk projects beyond 2017 when their funding runs out.  A subsequent YES vote would open the lockbox.  Under the Arizona State Constitution, a new Home Rule ballot measure may be submitted to Sedona voters in two years’ time, not four, IF Home Rule is defeated.

    Sedona Gift Shop

    By the way, the Lodging Council’s proclaimed reduction of “over $10 million a year” isn’t always the case.  Using the City Publicity Pamphlet estimates, the cuts without Home Rule are $9.0 million next year and $7.4 million the following year.  

    I voted NO on Home Rule.

    2 Comments

    1. J. Rick Normand on August 21, 2014 6:36 pm

      @Jean Jenks,

      Jean, you are unequivocally the smartest city budget and fiscal analyst in Sedona, including anyone on City Staff. I would hope that thinking voters heed your words and outcry. While I’m on the same page as you, please permit me to suggest another way to think about opposition to Home Rule. I think the voters just think of the Home Rule Option as a straight yes or no proposition. Not so, there is another alternative to Home Rule that hasn’t been disclosed to Sedona’s voters…and this neglect is by design.

      The City’s Pamphlet entitled “FACTS on Home Rule,” as well as the proponents of the Home Rule advocacy argument and the City media outlet aka RRN’s editorial support for Home Rule, are typical examples of how government at all levels, as well as our own local Chamber, propagandize an issue. Relative to any given issue, they first give the reader/viewer an avalanche of official information that has absolutely no probative value, then they string together these useless facts into an apparently valid logic string, then they give you an official conclusion derived from a logical deductive leap. This is a fancy way of saying they employ marketing wordsmiths who take bogus information that is either false, exaggerated, or unrelated and craft it into a persuasive argument targeted at the unwary which is intended to lead them to believe that if they don’t accept the promoter’s conclusion, life as we know it on earth will quickly end. A good example of this is “If we don’t have a regime change in Iraq by overthrowing Saddam Hussein, then we will have Middle Eastern civil, religious and factional wars for years into the future.” Wrong premise leading to a conclusion of unintended consequences!

      Moreover, voters must beware of the old shell game wherein what’s important is the information that isn’t disclosed by proponents of an issue. Proponent’s comments are excellent but still constitute a version of the old shell game. Think about this…

      If Home Rule is not adopted by a majority of the qualified voters, the state-imposed expenditure limitation applies and no new home rule may be submitted to the voters for at least 2 years. Proponents, are you saying Sedona couldn’t wait just 2 years to learn how to control the never-ending expansion of non-critical project spending as it pays down its excessive $36 million in bonded debt and $4 million in City Hall mortgage debt while building up rainy-day reserves/Enterprise Funds? Are you implying that it is necessarily beyond Sedona’s management capability to develop non-tax revenues such as the immensely fiscally successful resort City of Palm Desert, CA?

      There are options you didn’t mention other than just “yes or no” on Home Rule. In the alternative, the City of Sedona may submit to its voters a Permanent Base Adjustment (only) Option …something you failed to mention when you should have.

      Permanent Base Adjustment does away with Home Rule. If Permanent Base Adjustment gets voter approval, the city no longer has to put Home Rule on the ballot every four years. The city can still determine its own spending limitation based on its revenue. It’s a good thing! The Home Rule Option prescribes the liberal CAFR Federal METHOD the municipality will use to calculate its own expenditure limitation each year whereas the Permanent Base Adjustment Option requires the use of a more conventional State statue prescribed accounting method . Several West Valley (Phoenix area) cities have already approved Permanent Base Adjustment and Sedona should applaud them. Permanent Base Adjustment does not raise taxes or allow the city to spend with no discretion. All it does is allow the city to spend the revenue it brings in predicated upon a base point at the time it is voted in. Of course, to do this would require the City to do a much better job of generating realistic revenue and expenditure estimates in light of real current economic conditions instead of imaginary absurd “never-ending good times” predictions. The Permanent Base Adjustment, as does the Home Rule Option, provides for an annual inflation rate adjustment of nearly 3 percent when the Federal government says inflation is running nearer 2%. Surely the City can live with that. Permanent Base Adjustment offers communities more flexibility in budgeting but makes it harder to adopt special interest group pet projects or no bid Chamber contracts or Staff, Chamber and Council beautification wish lists. In other words, if a city is to adopt a Permanent Adjusted Base Rate Option it had better do realistic budget forecast estimates.

      Anyway, certain revenues are specifically excluded from the state-imposed expenditure limitation. For example, revenues received from the issuance of bonds, revenues received from interest or dividends and certain non-tax revenues, revenue from Federal grants, and intergovernmental revenue already subject to another entity’s expenditure limitation, are all exempt from the expenditure limit under either option. If the state-imposed limitation does not allow for the expenditure of sufficient local funds (less the exemptions listed above) then State law provides four options to potentially solve this problem, as follows.

      • Alternative expenditure limitation (local Home Rule option)

      • A permanent base adjustment without Home Rule Option

      • A capital projects accumulation fund

      • A one-time override

      All of the options require voter approval. If none of the options are approved by the voters, the state-imposed limitation will apply.

      Why don’t any of the local proponents of Home Rule digress to the media with an in-depth analysis of the advantages/disadvantages of these other alternatives?

    2. Jean Jenks on August 22, 2014 8:39 am

      The election is next Tuesday, and that’s my focus. I’ve no plans to get into Permanent Base Adjustment. While I’ve read about it, I don’t believe Permanent Base Adjustment would work out for Sedona. I feel City Hall requires a better Council and management staff. If someone wants to take this issue on during thorny times, please be my guest.

      Incidentally, Terry Nash did an awesome job of analyzing and writing on City of Sedona finances, but he moved to Texas some years ago. I’m 76 and only have a limited amount of time to devote to the financial hole City Hall is digging.


    The Symbolism of Jan. 6

    By Tommy Acosta
    Don’t mess with symbols. Just ask author Dan Brown’s character Robert Landon. The worth of symbols cannot be measured. Symbols make the world-go-round. Symbols carry the weight of a thousand words and meanings. Symbols represent reality boiled down to the bone. Symbols evoke profound emotions and memories—at a very primal level of our being—often without our making rational or conscious connections. They fuel our imagination. Symbols enable us to access aspects of our existence that cannot be accessed in any other way. Symbols are used in all facets of human endeavor. One can only feel sorry for those who cannot comprehend the government’s response to the breech of the capital on January 6, with many, even pundits, claiming it was only a peaceful occupation. Regardless if one sees January 6 as a full-scale riot/insurrection or simply patriotic Americans demonstrating as is their right, the fact is the individuals involved went against a symbol, and this could not be allowed or go unpunished. Read more→
    Recent Comments
    • JB on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    • Sean Dedalus on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    • JB on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    • JB on Today’s Photo from Ted Grussing Photography: When The Universe Speaks
    • Buddy Oakes on Musicians You Didn’t Know Were From Sedona
    Categories
    © 2023 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.