Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona News
    • Business Profiles
    • Opinion
    • Mind & Body
    • Arts
    • Elections
    • Gift Shop
    • Contact
    • Advertise
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home » Letter to the Editor: Save the Endangered Historic Preservation Commission
    Letter to The Editor

    Letter to the Editor: Save the Endangered Historic Preservation Commission

    June 18, 20134 Comments
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp

    By Ann Jarmusch
    Historic Preservation Commissioner
    (June 18, 2013) 

    logo_lettereditorI am appalled that City Council voted 4-3 to disband Sedona’s effective Historic Preservation Commission. Sedona’s irreplaceable heritage is at stake now that HPC itself is endangered. Done properly, preservation enriches our daily lives, heritage tourism, Native American legacy, property values and, especially, Sedona’s authentic character.

    Historic preservation requires ongoing study of preservation practices issued by the Secretary of the Interior and adopted by cities and states. Without HPC’s knowledgeable oversight, proactive monitoring and public awareness efforts, unique historic sites and buildings in Sedona and Oak Creek Canyon face heightened risks of neglect, misguided alterations and redevelopment.

    Once a historic resource is lost or improperly altered, it is gone forever.

    The seven volunteer commissioners, led by top-notch preservationist Brynn Unger, donate expertise that surely equals or exceeds the thousands of dollars consultants would charge the city. HPC is our qualified, federally required link to state and national preservation officials, standards and practices, including landmarking. The Secretary of the Interior’s detailed standards – which cover restoration, renovation and more – ensure a national tapestry of exceptional places.

    Sedona Gift Shop

    Eliminating Sedona’s highly productive HPC would jeopardize our irreplaceable historic buildings and sites, dozens of which are “tagged” but not yet listed among the 24 on Sedona’s register. (See www.sedonaaz.gov/sedonacms/index.aspx?page=224). Still more landmarks appear on the prestigious National Register of Historic Places. Essentially, every designated landmark across the land — including our Chapel of the Holy Cross, the Hart Store (Hummingbird House) and historic Forest Service buildings — reflects and reminds us of America’s remarkable story.

    Hearing of the city’s plans to drop HPC, a conscientious landmark owner told me, “I wonder if my landmark status will mean anything anymore.”

    Let’s urge City Council to keep HPC as is, so we honor and protect all the historic places that add richness and meaning to our lives.

    Healing Paws

    This is an advertisement

    4 Comments

    1. Bethany Braley on June 19, 2013 9:18 am

      I urge the people of Sedona to fight to keep their Historic Preservation Commission intact. The Dalai Lama described the importance of preservation best for me when he pointed out that the way China is destroying Tibet is by systematically destroying all evidence of its culture and heritage, burning their books, tearing down their buildings, forbidding them from teaching their music or folk dances, which he pointed out, is the real glue that holds a culture together and in fact, is what makes it a ‘culture.’

      • STEVE SEGNER on June 22, 2013 11:49 am

        I Checked with the state office, of historic commission, and they said no combo with P and Z.
        HPC. needs to be a free standing commission with trained members …. city staff should have done it’s homework.
        I do not think the city really wants to get rid of HPC. They just do not want any commissions for some reason. If staff had asked us or even listened to commission members they would have not painted themselves into a corner, Bad advice has now put the city council in a tight spot.
        Steve Segner

        read the last line (below) very interesting….
        Brynn,

        The notion that the commission could be dismissed and, in execution of the HP program, staff would consult with individual members on an ad hoc basis, is far removed from the substance as well as the letter of the Sedona HP zoning ordinance upon which the contract with the State, pertaining to, among other things, grants from the State’s allotment of the HP fund is authorized, and upon which undertakings and understandings the National Park Service has based certification of Sedona’s HP program. The creation of an active commission is integral to compliance with the requirement for public partition in the program, in a public forum, and to assure governmental transparency.

        Robert R. Frankeberger, AIA
        Architect
        State Historic Preservation Office
        1300 West Washington Street
        Phoenix, AZ 85007

    2. Bill Eich on June 24, 2013 10:28 am

      About the Historic Preservation Committee
      Why not just privatize it? It could become a 501(C)3, with by-laws and all and when they decide they want preservation make a request to the City Council to consider it? The city could help it get started – not with money as they seem to dislike that – but by offering a free meeting room or such. I feel the Historic Preservation committee may actually find that to their liking, free from any City influence. If the City refuses a request, the 501(C)3 could mount an “education campaign” which I am sure the City Council would not enjoy!
      Bill Eich

    3. Marlene Rayner on June 24, 2013 11:37 am

      Wow! If what has been said in the article and the comments above are true, then our fabulous City staff has screwed up again on details which matter, of course.


    Analyzing City’s Legal Right to
    Ban OHVs on Public Roads

    By Tommy Acosta
    Mea Culpa! Mea Culpa! Mea Maxima Culpa! I screwed up. Blew it. Totally made a fool of myself. Missed the boat. I am talking about my editorial on the OHV fight, No Legal Traction on OHVs. I assumed that it was ADOT that would make a decision on whether the city could legally ban off road vehicles from our public roads like S.R. 89A and S.R. 179. Man was I off. ADOT has nothing to do with allowing or disallowing the city to do so. ADOT’s response to me when I asked them to clarify their position, was curt and to the point. “ADOT designs, builds and maintains the state highway system,” I was told. “It is not our place to offer an opinion on how state law might apply in this matter.” It was a totally “duh” moment for me when I realized that that the decision or judgement on the OHV ordinance, would involve the state and not ADOT. Chagrinned I stand. The crux of the matter then is whether the city can effectively use a number of standing state laws that can be interpreted to determine whether the city can legally ban the vehicles or not. Read more→
    Recent Comments
    • JB on Mayor & Council Deserve Kudos For Chamber Oversight
    • Richard Kepple on Analyzing City’s Legal Right to Ban OHVs on Public Roads
    • Mary on Analyzing City’s Legal Right to Ban OHVs on Public Roads
    • JB on DORR Hosts Talk on Gun Violence Prevention
    • Sheila Jackman on Remembering Sedona Sculptor John Soderberg: A Tribute to a Creative Genius
    Categories
    © 2023 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.