Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona News
    • Business Profiles
    • Opinion
    • Mind & Body
    • Arts
    • Elections
    • Gift Shop
    • Contact
    • Advertise
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home » Recall Effort Against School Board Member Ends
    Sedona

    Recall Effort Against School Board Member Ends

    May 6, 20154 Comments
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    SOCUSD Governing Board Member Zach Richardson
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp

    By Tommy Acosta
    Associate Editor

    Sedona AZ (May 6, 2015) – The effort to recall Sedona Oak Creek Unified School District Governing Board member Zach Richardson, has failed.

    Yavapai County School Superintendent Tim Carter notified Mr. Richardson of the failure in an email dated Wednesday, May 6, 2015.

    SOCUSD Governing Board Member Zach Richardson
    SOCUSD Governing Board Member Zach Richardson

    “The recall effort against you was NOT successful,” Mr. Carter stated in his email. “The committee did not turn in the requisite petitions by deadline yesterday [May 5, 2015]. This concludes the matter.”

    The effort to recall Mr. Richardson, was initiated by a committee of Sedona citizens concerned over the way the board member conducts official school business.

    The recallers claimed that Mr. Richardson was a “bully” and was the driving force behind a decision to assign a second principal at West Sedona School during his tenure as governing board president.

    The dual-principal model at WSS, was recommended by SOCUSD Superintendent Dave Lykins because of the school’s near-failing grade in last year’s AIMS testing, according to the district.

    Four out of five board members had voted for the dual-principal model at WSS.

    Sedona Gift Shop

    The recall committee believed by removing Mr. Richardson they could elect someone amenable to their perspective on education and reverse a perceived 3-2 voting block majority in the school board to their favor.

    The recallers believed splitting the school into a dual-principal model was an insult to the standing principal, considered a top-notch educator by many of her supporters.

    WSS Principal Dr. Lisa Hirsch did not seek a new contract for the next school year and has accepted a position in Sedona’s charter school.

    Numerous negative articles and letters criticizing Mr. Richardson appeared in Sedona’s local print media but did not sway public opinion enough to get people to sign the recall petitions in numbers.

    Mr. Richardson said he acknowledged the right of the recallers to petition his removal but knew from the start they would fail in their effort.

    “Parents, teachers and members of our community know me,” he said. ‘They know how hard my family and I work to support the district. Despite what the papers say I am trusted and respected in the community, as evidenced by the recall failure. Although I acknowledge their right to do so, the recall effort hurt the students, the schools and our community. Had it succeeded I was prepared to run again and win with the full support of those who first elected me. Further, I have no intention of resigning.”

    EDITOR’S NOTE : At press time the total number of  recall-petition signatures collected is unknown. We are awaiting comment from the recall committee which will be added to this article as soon as it is received.

    Sedona Sedona AZ News Sedona news

    4 Comments

    1. eric mendelsohn on May 7, 2015 10:05 am

      The recall committee collected enough signatures to recall Zach if he had had opposition in the last election. One of the districts problems has long been a lack of involvement in school issues among parents and citizens of our district. The committee strongly feels it will go forward as an active voice in our schools and reserve the option to try to recall Mr. Richardson in the future. We feel the most recent action of the 3 man triumphant on the board of Richardson, Stovall and Miller to give Mr. Lykins a 20% raise in salary continues their record of mismanagement.

      • Zach Richardson on May 7, 2015 12:22 pm

        Eric, your comments make no sense, as usual. If there is an upcoming election, then there is no need for a recall. So what you are actually disclosing is that through all your efforts to attain signatures, you only received about 100, the amount required to be on the school board ballot. This number is far short of the 1,800 signatures Tim Carter suggested for a successful recall, only about 5% of the required signatures. Obviously Sedona did not support your recall efforts.

        As to the superintendent’s salary, he is awarded the same compensation the whole board promised him 3 years ago. We have all learned that just because the Red Rock News makes a statement, it does not mean that their statement is true.

        Please thank the recall committee for selecting you as their chairperson. As I will continually state, if I had to choose someone to chair a campaign against me, you would be my first choice, without hesitation.

    2. Steve Liberman on May 7, 2015 9:02 pm

      Finally the vendetta is over, or is it.? I fail to understand Eric’s first comment about the lack of opposition to the election. What does that have to do with the unsuccessful recall that divided a school district and compromised the education of our children. The statement to possibly recall Mr. Richardson in the future demonstrates the obsession with an agenda aimed at one individual. Why not utilize that energy to enhance our schools, with everyone coming together, expressing their opinions, and moving forward. If Zach is I such a divisive force, if the Board is not in sync with the school system, I agree with you Eric. We must get them off the Board. Eric, it’s called an election. Gather your candidates, plan your strategy and place your energy, that was wasted on the recall, to get the candidates elected that you and your committee can rally behind.

      • eric mendelsohn on May 8, 2015 11:22 am

        1196 signatures (10% of the electorate) were required since in the last election you had no opposition. If there had been 3 candidates for the 2 seats we would have only needed 25% of the actual number voting. We collected many hundreds of signatures, some who indicated they were your friends Zach but felt your public persona was less that the wanted as a public face. Other board members have indicated that no guarantees of salary increases had been made to Mr. Lykins. Probably just another back room deal between you and him.


    The Symbolism of Jan. 6

    By Tommy Acosta
    Don’t mess with symbols. Just ask author Dan Brown’s character Robert Landon. The worth of symbols cannot be measured. Symbols make the world-go-round. Symbols carry the weight of a thousand words and meanings. Symbols represent reality boiled down to the bone. Symbols evoke profound emotions and memories—at a very primal level of our being—often without our making rational or conscious connections. They fuel our imagination. Symbols enable us to access aspects of our existence that cannot be accessed in any other way. Symbols are used in all facets of human endeavor. One can only feel sorry for those who cannot comprehend the government’s response to the breech of the capital on January 6, with many, even pundits, claiming it was only a peaceful occupation. Regardless if one sees January 6 as a full-scale riot/insurrection or simply patriotic Americans demonstrating as is their right, the fact is the individuals involved went against a symbol, and this could not be allowed or go unpunished. Read more→
    Recent Comments
    • Terrie Frankel on 2023 Welcome Home Vietnam Veteran’s Day Tribute in Camp Verde
    • Blair C Mignacco on SB1100 Would Increase the Allowable Weight of OHVs
    • Jon Thompson on SB1100 Would Increase the Allowable Weight of OHVs
    • JB on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    • Sean Dedalus on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    Categories
    © 2023 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.