Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona News
    • Business Profiles
    • Opinion
    • Mind & Body
    • Arts
    • Elections
    • Gift Shop
    • Contact
    • Advertise
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home » Vote Yes on Prop 410: It’s a Win-Win for Sedona
    Arizona

    Vote Yes on Prop 410: It’s a Win-Win for Sedona

    October 30, 20112 Comments
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp

    Healing Paws

     There Are No Guarantees in Life or in Sedona

    By Tommy Acosta

    Sedona, AZ (October 30, 2011) – This editorial is not for those who have made up their minds and voted early on the 89A referendum but for those who are against the lights but fear the cost of assuming responsibility over the scenic route will be too much for Sedona; for those who have yet to cast their vote.

    Sometimes knowing what to do can be harder than finding a snowflake of truth in a blizzard of lies, especially when facts are turned inside out and deception rules the day.

    Whether we take over 89A or not, there is no guarantee ADOT will come to the bargaining table with the same offer as before. They may give us more. They may give us less. They may even force us to take 89A without a monetary carrot attached.

    If Prop 410 wins then what those who fought against the 89A transfer accomplished is to mess up the prior 89A deal with ADOT, possibly resulting in less or no money for Sedona if ADOT decides to play hardball if anticipated-highway revenues further tank.

    If Prop 410 is defeated, then its proponents may have wasted valuable city funds on a special election that will not, in the end, guarantee the erection of the lights.

    Since the 89A fight is all about the lights and everybody knows it, has anyone considered the possibility that the Fed money allegedly earmarked for the light poles might not be there anymore?

    Could it be we are fighting over an illusion?

    The money for the lights is supposed to come from the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient, Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). This Act funds needed highway improvements states cannot afford.

    SAFETEA-LU, which expired in 2009 and extended eight times since, allocates about $41 billion per year on transportation projects.

    The Congressional Budget Office estimates the shortfall in transportation revenue for the Act will reach $14 billion in FY 2012.

    That means the Feds have only $27 billion to throw around for SAFETEA-LU. There will be priorities. Lights for 89A might not be on the Fed’s short list. The whole lights fight and referendum could be for nothing.

    For those who fear the dough ADOT offered us to take 89A will be spent on vainglorious safety improvements, let us suppose Prop 410 passes and ADOT lives up to its original deal.

    Sedona Gift Shop

    There is nothing, no one, no government agency forcing the city to blow the $10 million-plus bundle ADOT originally offered on expensive medians and roundabouts. We can stash the cash and use it when we really need it.

    The city can pick and choose, with public input, how much to spend and what to spend it on. Sedona owns the road and no one but its citizens can decide what to do with it.

    Now…what to do? You don’t want the lights but you are concerned about the costs of 89A ownership?

    Let logic rule your vote.

    Vote yes on Prop 410 and the city gets to go back on the bargaining table. Maybe we get a better deal or maybe not. Makes no difference! We still have the option of letting ADOT keep it and walk and away from the bargaining table if we don’t get the offer we want. Nothing is lost and the fear of taking it over is no more.

    Vote yes on Prop 410 and even if ADOT says screw you, no deal, they still can’t get the lights up because they ain’t got the money. Even if they do, we can tie them up in court for a few years. By then the economy will be so miserable they won’t have the money for sure.

    If we lose in court and somehow they get the funding, we make them pay for the electricity. They may not even have the cash for that and we still get to keep our dark skies.

    Voting yes on Prop 410 is a win-win for those who don’t want the lights. Period!

    The answer to your dilemma dear conflicted Sedonans is simple. You don’t want the lights? Vote yes on Prop 410.

    Oh, and one last thought for those who fought valiantly for Sedona dark skies that are still on the fence.

    Don’t let the other side win.

    prop 410 tommy acosta

    2 Comments

    1. Don Gay on November 1, 2011 12:24 pm

      In addition to the paper version of the Red Rock News, I also receive the electronic version. When it sent out the editiorial against Prop 410, I sent in several comments. 1. Since most accidents occur during the daytime, how do these lights help to prevent them? 2. Wouldn’t conveniently located, pedestrian controlled crosswalks serve pedestrians both during the day and night? 3. Why would the Red Rock News call those who would disagree with their position ‘insane,” because that seems at least a bit strange.
      My comments were never published but one that was supportive of their position was along with one that as basically neutral. Mark Twain said to never argue with people who by ink by the barrel. It is unfortunate that the Red Rock News lacks objectivity and tries to stifle dissent. Additionally, it appears that they cannot accept any criticism no matter how polite, objective or valid it is. It reflects poorly on both the publisher and editor. Running a newpaper doesn’t make one a journalist or objective; it just provides the opportunity to do so.

    2. Bettye on November 1, 2011 9:17 pm

      Thank You Tommy, for bringing Your perspective to the table. It’s wise and warranted.


    City Council Weighs ATV Ban Ordinance Proposal
    By Tommy Acosta
    The Sedona City Council at its May 23, 2023 meeting took no action on a proposed ordinance that would ban all off-road vehicles from being driven on state-owned public roads or streets owned by the city. The ordinance, spearheaded by Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow on the premise that such vehicles pose a risk to the health, safety and welfare of the community, would impose heavy fines to anyone driving the ATVs or OHVs on city streets, including S.R. 179 and S.R. 89A. ATV rental companies have admitted that such vehicles are not intended or designed to be driven on paved roads, yet, in Arizona, they are allowed to do so under Arizona Revised Statute 28-1174 (4B). Opponents against the ordinance argued at the meeting that if adopted the ban would cripple the ATV rental industry in Sedona and cause much hardship to the owners and employees, as it would effectively, as written, destroy their livelihood. Read more→
    Recent Comments
    • JB on DORR Hosts Talk on Gun Violence Prevention
    • Mary on No Legal Traction on OHVs
    • Michael Schroeder on DORR Hosts Talk on Gun Violence Prevention
    • JB on Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow talks OHV Ordinance
    • JB on City Council Weighs ATV Ban Ordinance Proposal
    Categories
    © 2023 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.