Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona
      • Arts and Entertainment
      • Bear Howard Chronicles
      • Business Profiles
      • City of Sedona
      • Elections
      • Goodies & Freebies
      • Mind & Body
      • Sedona News
    • Opinion
    • Real Estate
    • About
    • The Sedonan
    • Advertise
    • Sedona’s Best
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home»Sedona News»City of Sedona»Sedona City Talk: Zoning Basics
    City of Sedona

    Sedona City Talk: Zoning Basics

    August 27, 20153 Comments
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp

    City of Sedona ArizonaBy Councilor Jessica Williamson

    Sedona AZ (August 27, 2015) – I regularly hear from Sedona residents who say that they don’t want any more national chain stores here in Sedona.  What they want is small, locally owned mom-and-pop businesses that sell products for local residents.  They don’t understand why the City Council doesn’t make that happen.

    Arizona is a property rights state, and cities and towns are constrained as to what limits can be placed on an owner’s use of their property.  If a piece of land is zoned commercial and is sold to a national chain, that chain can develop their business there if it meets zoning requirements.  The City can establish development criteria such as design guidelines, sign regulations, building height and setbacks, but those criteria have to apply to every commercial development.  The City cannot treat a national chain store any differently than a mom-and-pop store would be treated, nor can the City establish preferences among eligible commercial uses by saying that a little store that sells socks and underwear is preferable to a national chain store or a gas station.

    Businesses that are developed in accordance with zoning aren’t even considered by City Council.  Those developments are reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission, but only to determine that the developments as planned meet the City’s design guidelines and Land Development Code.  Considering the use of the property is not part of Planning and Zoning’s statutory authority when the proposed development is in accordance with zoning.   

    Sedona Gift Shop

    Some Sedona residents also are concerned that too much development is occurring and would like it stopped.  However, all the property in Sedona is zoned for something, and the City cannot prevent owners from developing their property as of right.  If the City unilaterally changed zoning to reduce an owner’s development options, the City would be subject to Proposition 207 which requires the City to pay an owner for the property value that is lost by the change in zoning.

    A property owner can request a change in zoning, as happened with CVS.  Because rezoning allows uses not permitted or conditioned under current zoning, the request is subject to City Council approval and the owner must demonstrate the benefits to the community to support the request.  The City Council can approve or deny a request for rezoning, but it cannot do so arbitrarily or without a legitimate reason.  The use of the property is not a legitimate reason, and the City Council cannot cite that as a reason for denying rezoning.  If CVS met the requirements of the requested new commercial zoning, the City could not deny the request because people don’t think we need another pharmacy, because we don’t want a pharmacy at that location, or because we don’t like big corporations.

    The good news is that the Sedona City staff is embarking on a comprehensive review of the regulations in the Land Development Code that govern development in our City.  While the City cannot stop people from developing their land, we can change our requirements (while still complying with state law) so that the development we get conforms more closely to the Community Plan goals. 

    The opinions expressed are mine alone and do not reflect the opinions of the Sedona City Council.

    Healing Paws

    This is an advertisement

    3 Comments

    1. Erin McMillen on August 27, 2015 7:32 pm

      As an owner of a “mom and pop” business in Sedona, I have witnessed the majority of our support coming from tourists despite advertising to and offering discounts to locals. In the end, where dollars are spent proves what people support. I’ve sadly watched many mom and pops go out of business here. If locals were supporting them, they would still be here.

    2. J. J. on August 28, 2015 1:07 pm

      After Walgreen’s announced it will be closing 600 stores next year, I’m wondering why CVS just didn’t try to take over the existing Walgreen’s pharmacy, instead of holding Sedona hostage. They purchased the property KNOWING they could not build on that lot but they used their “big business” dollars and our City Council sold the citizens of Sedona down the river (again). Wish there was something we could do, short of pitchforks, tar and feathers.

    3. can't agree more! on August 28, 2015 1:17 pm

      Quote: While the City cannot stop people from developing their land, we can change our requirements (while still complying with state law) so that the development we get conforms more closely to the Community Plan goals.

      Yes, you CAN stop people from developing their land if that development is illegal.

      For example, The “Western Gateway,” AKA the former Cultural Park owner can LEGALLY do one of two things with “his” property when the lease to City trailheads ends next year – he can 1) lease the property back to the Cultural Park, or 2) give the land back to the USFS. All this stuff we’re hearing about development on that land is just BS – according to the original land trade, the property has been set aside for non-profit use ONLY. If the City Council does not abide by this agreement, they are as bad as any other thug criminal. That land has been set aside for all of us.

    If I Were Curtis Sliwa
    By Tommy Acosta

    One of my guilty little pleasures is imagining what I would do if I was in someone else’s shoes, especially politicians. In this essay I would love to jump into the shoes of Curtis Sliwa, a former New York City vigilante who founded the Guardian Angels and is now running as a Republican for mayor of his city.

    Read more→

    The Sedonan
    House of Seven Arches
    Need More Customers?
    Bear Howard Chronicles
    Humankind
    Tlaquepaque
    Verde Valley Wine Trail
    Recent Comments
    • Mark Harris on The Attics of Conscience — What Could Soon Happen in Sedona and Across America
    • Daniel J Sullivan MDJD on If I Was Curtis Sliwa
    • Jill Dougherty on If I Was Curtis Sliwa
    • Blue on Between Bombs and Olive Branches: The Art of the Deal
    • Blue on The Attics of Conscience — What Could Soon Happen in Sedona and Across America
    • Charles H Blum on License to Spy
    • TJ Hall on If I Was Curtis Sliwa
    • JB on If I Was Curtis Sliwa
    • Stephanie lenore Maciel on The Attics of Conscience — What Could Soon Happen in Sedona and Across America
    • Michael Schroeder on The Attics of Conscience — What Could Soon Happen in Sedona and Across America
    • Michael Schroeder on License to Spy
    • Brian mcgillin on If I Was Curtis Sliwa
    • TJ Hall on If I Was Curtis Sliwa
    • JB on If I Was Curtis Sliwa
    • Jill Dougherty on Cottonwood, Verde Valley Residents Join Largest Protest Yet to Reject Abuses of Power
    Archives
    The Sedonan
    © 2025 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.