Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona News
    • Business Profiles
    • Opinion
    • Mind & Body
    • Arts
    • Elections
    • Contact
    • Cart
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home » Sedona City Council Member Addresses State Transportation Board
    Sedona

    Sedona City Council Member Addresses State Transportation Board

    May 22, 2011No Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Place ads on Sedona.biz

    Councilor Mike Ward Speaks Regarding SR 89A Route Transfer

    Sedona, AZ (May 20, 2011) – On Friday, May 20, 2011, Sedona City Councilor Mike Ward attended the State Transportation Board meeting in Flagstaff. At their regular City Council meeting on Tuesday, May 10, Council approved that he attend to request that ADOT delay any actions with respect to SR 89A until the conclusion of the City’s November 8, 2011 referendum election. In addition, Council approved that his presentation be focused on the important right of the citizens to vote.

    At the Board meeting, Councilor Ward stated, “We are requesting that ADOT extend the deadline of the Route Transfer Agreement to December 15. We ask for this delay because a group of voters has filed a legal petition calling for a referendum on the Council’s decision to accept the transfer. Until the election the City cannot take action on the issue.”

    In addition, he said, “Our City stands ready and willing to do whatever is legally possible in order to alleviate your concerns about deferring this matter until after the referendum election in November. Please give us the opportunity to reach a final resolution of this issue that meets our mutual goals and aspirations while at the same time respecting the legal right of the citizens of Sedona to give their final say at the ballot box.”

    A copy of his presentation is attached.

    For more information, please contact the City Manager’s office at (928) 204-7127.

    [A Video of the Councilor Ward’s address can be seen at the top of this posting]

    “Mr. Chairman, members of the Board, thank you for giving me this opportunity to speak to you today.

    I am Mike Ward, of Sedona Arizona

    I am a member of the Sedona City Council and have been selected by the City Council to speak on its behalf. We are requesting that ADOT extend the deadline of the Route Transfer Agreement to December 15. We ask for this delay because a group of voters has filed a legal petition calling for a referendum on the Council’s decision to accept the transfer. Until the election the city cannot take action on the issue.

    As a State Board of Transportation, you have exclusive control over the State’s highways, including those highways within Sedona’s city limits. We recognize that you have a duty to insure that these roadways are safe and that for the past few years you have attempted to fulfill that duty with respect to proposed improvements of Hwy 89A. While we have disagreed on how to go about improving this roadway, it was our sincere hope, as it was surely yours, that by entering the route transfer agreement, our differences would be resolved and that you could transfer control of this roadway to the City to allow us to put in our desired safety improvements.

    Our State Constitution guarantees the right of the citizens to appeal legislative actions of their elected councils by referring the Council’s decision directly to the voters.

    Exercising their rights, a group of Sedona voters successfully met all of the legal requirements in petitioning for a referendum vote to either affirm or reverse the council’s decision on the route transfer. Yavapai and Coconino counties have certified the petitions which contain 14% of the registered voters in Sedona who may or may not represent the opinion of the majority. County and state election rules determined the earliest election date possible as November 8, 2011.

    While the City would like to immediately assume full ownership and control of this roadway, the pending referendum makes that legally impossible. This citizen referendum has put both the city and ADOT in a difficult situation.

    We humbly appeal on behalf of the voters of Sedona, that you defer action to opt out of the transfer agreement until after the November 8th referendum election to allow the voters to exercise their constitutional right to decide this important community issue.

    I also appeal to the state board’s self interest. It is clear through your good faith and flexibility during our negotiations over the last nine months that you are very much interested in divesting yourself of the urban highway corridor through West Sedona. Our negotiations demonstrate that ADOT and the City of Sedona do have the ability to work together on difficult issues as evidenced by the award-winning transformation of Highway 179. Neither process has been easy. The difference between having a similar success with Hwy 89A depends on your continued patience and forbearance for another 6 months.

    We have both come too far to give up now. This negotiated Transfer Agreement may be our last opportunity to accomplish our mutual goals of city ownership and roadway safety improvements that are in conformity with the desires of the Community.

    Our City stands ready and willing to do whatever is legally possible in order to alleviate your concerns about deferring this matter until after the referendum election in November. Please give us the opportunity to reach a final resolution of this issue that meets our mutual goals and aspirations while at the same time respecting the legal right of the citizens of Sedona to give their final say at the ballot box.

    Again, thank you for the opportunity to address you in behalf of the Sedona City Council.”

     

    Place ads on Sedona.biz

    Scott mayor
    samaireformayor
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Publisher
    • Twitter

    Related Posts

    It’s Both

    August 8, 2022

    Jewish Community of Sedona and the Verde Valley: August 12-18, 2022

    August 6, 2022

    Fill sandbags at these sites

    August 5, 2022

    Comments are closed.

    Paid Political Ad Paid For by Samaire for Mayor
    Paid Political Ad for Samaire Armstrong
    Paid Political Announcement by Samaire For Mayor

     THE MOMENT IS UPON US

    Dear Sedona,

    The moment is upon us. The time for a united effort to shift the focus back to our community is now.

    The ability to thrive in our community, our environment, our workforce, and the tourist industry, is entirely possible because we have all the resources needed for success.

    Still, we need a council that isn’t afraid to ask the hard questions, that makes decisions based on data and facts, and through discussion, rather than moving and voting in group unison as they so regularly do.

    This is my home. I have been a part of the Sedona community for 28 years. I witnessed the road debacle, the lack of planning, the city circumventing the local businesses ability to thrive, while making choices to expand the local government and be in direct competition with private industry.

    I am a unique candidate because unlike the incumbents, I don’t believe the government should expand in size, nor in operations, nor would I attempt to micromanage every aspect of our community.

    City government should stay in its lane and allow the competitive market of local private industry to prosper. And it should defend our community from corporate takeover and infiltration of our town.

    I do not agree that we should sign onto International Building Codes and regulations by signing Sedona up to the ICC. It is imperative that we remain a sweet, rural community.

    Where are the arts? Where is this organic thriving element that we allege to be animated by. Where is our culture? Where is our community?

    The discord between the decision making process and the desires of the community have never been more clear. It has been nearly a decade in the making.

    It is time for a new era of energy to take charge. An energy that is reflective in the ability to succeed rather than be trapped in out of date consciousness.

    It has been a great honor meeting with each of you. I hear your concerns over the insane and out of control spending and I echo them. A budget of $105,000,000 in a town of 9700 residents is completely unacceptable. A parking structure (that looks like a shoe box) originally slated to cost 11 million, now projected to cost 18 million, is incomprehensible. Especially, considering there is no intention of charging for parking.

    For those who are concerned that I lack the political experience within our established system- that is precisely what Sedona needs… Not another politician, but instead a person who understands people, who listens to the voices within the community, and who will act in service on their behalf with accountability, for the highest good of Sedona. What I am not, will prove to be an asset as I navigate the entrenched bureaucracy with a fresh perspective. Business as usual, is over.

    Creative solutions require new energy.

    Every decision that is made by our local government, must contemplate Sedona first.

    • Does this decision benefit the residents?
    • Does this decision benefit the local businesses?
    • Does this decision actually help the environment?
    • Will this decision sustain benefit in the future, or will it bring more problems?

    What we have now is a city government that expands to 165 employees for 9700 residents. Palm Desert has 53,000 residents and 119 city employees. Majority of our city department heads are not even in town. I find this problematic.

    Efforts towards championing in and courting new solutions for our medical needs are imperative. We are losing our doctors. We must encourage competition with other facilities rather than be held hostage by NAH, who clearly have their own set of dysfunctions.

    We must remember that so many move to Sedona for its beauty, hiking, and small town charm. Bigger, faster, and more concrete does not, in broad strokes, fit the ethos of Sedona.

    The old world must remain strong here in balance, as that is what visitors want to experience. Too many have noted that Sedona has lost its edge and charm.

    As Mayor I will preserve the rural charm of our community, and push back against the urbanization that is planned for Sedona.

    As mayor I will make it a priority to create opportunities to support our youth.  After school healthy, enriching programs should be created for our kids, and available to the Sedona workforce regardless of residency and regardless of school they belong to.

    As Mayor, I will create an agenda to deliberately embody the consciousness of our collective needs here, allowing private industry to meet the needs of our community rather than bigger government.

    I hope to have your vote on Aug 2nd. I am excited and have the energy to take on this leadership role with new eyes, community perspective, and the thoughtful consciousness that reflects all ages of the human spectrum.

    Thank you deeply for your consideration.

    Sincerely,

    Samaire Armstrong

    Sedona elections
    Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    Ready to Rumble

    By Tommy Acosta
    In the Blue Corner stands Scott Jablow and in the Red Corner of the ring stands Samaire Armstrong, ready to rumble to the bitter end in their fight to become the next Sedona mayor. Jablow weighs in with 1,137 primary election votes (36.13%) under his belt, having wielded his advantage as sitting Sedona City Council vice-mayor to his favor. He brings his years of serving in that capacity into the fray and waged a solid fight in his campaign to make it to the run-off. Armstrong, however withstood a blistering smear campaign from the other opposing candidates and their supporters to make it to the final bout with 967 votes under her belt (30.73%), an amazing feat for a political newcomer. Unfortunately, for the other two candidates, Kurt Gehlbach and sitting mayor Sandy Moriarty, neither put up enough of a fight to make it to the championship bout. Read more→
    Recent Comments
    • West Sedona Dave on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    • Bosco Hurn on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    • SSuzanne on All Arizonans at Risk for Monkeypox; Stigmatizing Only Gives False Sense of Security to All
    • Rob Adams on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    • Laurenza on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    Categories
    © 2022 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.