Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona News
    • Business Profiles
    • Opinion
    • Mind & Body
    • Arts
    • Elections
    • Gift Shop
    • Contact
    • Advertise
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home » Letter to The Editor: Contact Yavapai County About Spring Creek Ranch
    Letter to The Editor

    Letter to The Editor:
    Contact Yavapai County About Spring Creek Ranch

    February 24, 20205 Comments
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp

    By Craig Swanson
    Keep Sedona Beautiful

    Keep Sedona BeautifulSedona AZ (February 24, 2020) – After having their initial proposal rejected by Yavapai County, the developers of Spring Creek Ranch have submitted an Amended Letter of Intent and an Amended Site Plan.

    They now propose 2,100 housing units: 1,500 manufactured or site-built home lots of which up to 200 may be used for recreational vehicle pads, 400 rental units and a 200 unit assisted living facility. 

    A significant reason for rejection of the original proposal was the outpouring of community opposition.

    Sedona Gift Shop

    Keep Sedona Beautiful urges you to contact Yavapai County Planning and Zoning and each of the County Supervisors.

    You can visit THIS PAGE on the Keep Sedona Beautiful web site to learn more about the developer’s proposal and how to contact the County about this mega-development. You can read KSB’s comments to the County strongly opposing this proposal by CLICKING HERE.

    5 Comments

    1. Joan Shannon on February 24, 2020 4:02 pm

      Thank you Mr. Swanson of KSB for updating us on this proposed development. I will indeed write my letters to the P&Z and Supervisors. Joan Shannon

    2. Kenyon Taylor on March 2, 2020 9:11 am

      I will certainly get after this once again. You have made this process very streamlined and informative. THANK YOU!!

    3. Kenyon Taylor on March 2, 2020 9:12 am

      Thank you for making this process so streamlined and informative. Will be on this today.

    4. Jim Reich on March 2, 2020 3:00 pm

      After attending the last meeting in front of Yavapai Counting Planning & Zoning where there over 250 people (a whopping 8.3% of the Cornville population) against this crazy subdivision of monstrous proportion where there were only 11 people actually for it. I find it staggering and surprising that planning and zoning voted against it with a mere 5-4 vote. It’s unbelievable that four members of planning and zoning actually thought that its a good idea to build over 3,000 new homes in an area less than 300 acres which at a bear minimum will double Cornville’s population but really has the potential to triple or quadruple our population if families of two or four people live there.

      There are so many things that make this development a bad idea. Let’s just say that there is 5,000 people living there, many of which are likely to be retired and elderly. There is only one access road from State Route 89A into Spring Creek Ranch. The amount of traffic that this is going to create will be awful and extremely unsafe if and when there are medical emergencies. With traffic in neighboring Sedona being absolutely awful, this is a town with three main access points in and out of town. The developers of Spring Creek Ranch don’t care about the risks to the people living there, they just want to fit as many people on their tiny oasis of land as they possibly can, essentially building their own virtual city.

      Furthermore, they claim all the benefits that their subdivision is going to provide to the Verde Valley and Cornville residents. They even claim that their subdivision is going to be affordable, yet they maintain ownership of all the land. I’ve done the math
      on this, and they stand to take in over $15 million a year in rental revenue on the project. What do the residents get? Manufactured homes on lots where the current zoning is two homes per two acres and these developers want to increase that to eighteen homes per acre. That is absolutely absurd! They are wanting to build a small city in what’s a pristine and beautiful area of Cornville. And what’s even more unbelievable is that Yavapai County (elected officials that are supposed to represent us) think it’s a good idea.

      In my opinion, as a resident in the Verde Valley for nearly two decades, a homeowner in Cornville, and a local business owner, no matter how you disseminate the developers proposal, it is a bad idea for Cornville, the Verde Valley, our communities, and the environment. I urge all locally to research this and show up for the meetings. We need to make our voices loud and clear that we don’t want this here.

    5. Peggy Sands on March 2, 2020 10:05 pm

      Thanks, will write.
      Can you provide emails of whom to send a comment to?
      thanks


    The Symbolism of Jan. 6

    By Tommy Acosta
    Don’t mess with symbols. Just ask author Dan Brown’s character Robert Landon. The worth of symbols cannot be measured. Symbols make the world-go-round. Symbols carry the weight of a thousand words and meanings. Symbols represent reality boiled down to the bone. Symbols evoke profound emotions and memories—at a very primal level of our being—often without our making rational or conscious connections. They fuel our imagination. Symbols enable us to access aspects of our existence that cannot be accessed in any other way. Symbols are used in all facets of human endeavor. One can only feel sorry for those who cannot comprehend the government’s response to the breech of the capital on January 6, with many, even pundits, claiming it was only a peaceful occupation. Regardless if one sees January 6 as a full-scale riot/insurrection or simply patriotic Americans demonstrating as is their right, the fact is the individuals involved went against a symbol, and this could not be allowed or go unpunished. Read more→
    Recent Comments
    • Blair C Mignacco on SB1100 Would Increase the Allowable Weight of OHVs
    • Jon Thompson on SB1100 Would Increase the Allowable Weight of OHVs
    • JB on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    • Sean Dedalus on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    • JB on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    Categories
    © 2023 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.