By Tommy Acosta
Fur flew in the Mary D. Fisher Theatre Thursday, Oct 6, in the Red Rock News sponsored debate between Sedona mayoral candidates Scott Jablow and Samaire Armstrong.
Candidates expressed their differing opinions to questions posed by
RRN Editor Christopher Fox and RNN General Manager Kyle Larson.
Jablow pretty much touted his experience and the work he’s done through his eight years on the council to benefit Sedona, criticising Armstrong for her lack of political experience.
Armstrong said experience matters little, when you get zero results.
A number of boilerplate questions were asked of the candidates ranging from their positions on workforce housing, consent agendas, traffic, the city budget, trimming city staff — to short-term rentals.
Armstrong accused Jablow of lack of vision and ineffectiveness during his time on the council.
Jablow defended himself and his record, citing the many accomplishments he said benefited the city.
Armstrong said Jablow’s main function on the council was to be a “rubber stamp” for the Sedona Mayor Sandy Moriarty, an accusation Jablow strongly denied.
It was in the closing of the second half of the debate that the moderators unleashed their toughest questions.
They wanted to know the candidates’ level of support or lack of support for the Sedona Chamber of Commerce, understanding that the actions of the council, in eliminating destination marketing, hurt businesses that depend on tourism. Many believe it’s because the council derailed destination marketing that many Sedona business owners are now struggling to stay afloat.
Jablow blamed residents for pressuring the council to eliminate destination marketing. Jablow said the council stopped the chamber from destination marketing because Sedona residents simply did not want any more tourists.
He said he had knocked on hundreds of doors and he was asked by most of those who opened them to stop tourism.
He recognized that Sedona restaurants are doing poorly this season. He said the council would be revisiting the issue.
Armstrong responded by questioning Jablow’s leadership abilities, asking if he was “a leader or follower,” stating that the city had cut off the chamber’s ability to market Sedona without any consideration for the businesses.
She said money allocated for the chamber to manage tourism, should be spent for promotion.
“Let the chamber do what the chamber does best,” she said.
A question from the moderators no one expected, asked what they would do as mayor if another pandemic were to hit, considering the city was shut down and forced to wear masks during the pandemic by the city’s mayor.
Armstrong said she would never have the audacity to tell someone else what to do with their lives, based on “the whim” of a flawed national agenda.
She said it’s up to every individual to make the choice and that she is very strongly opposed to any person presuming they have dictatorial power over a city.
“I think it’s appalling that one individual would require something that is not scientifically proven,” she said, referring to the mask mandate.
Jablow asserted he did not support closing down the city or the mask mandate, stating that was the mayor’s choice, not his.
“I talked to many business owners who wanted to be able to post signs that required masks to enter,” he said. He said it’s right to have a choice.
He said he did not want to second guess the mayor.
“The mayor did it on her own,” he said. “I would not have made the same choice.”
The video of the complete debate can be viewed HERE .
The video was created, sponsored and published by The Red Rock News.
The next mayoral candidate forum will be held Wednesday, October 12, 6 to 8 p.m. at the Sedona Performing Arts Center. The forum will be sponsored by the Northern Arizona League of Women Voters.
Click HERE for details.
10 Comments
Time for a change, time for Armstrong !,
The reason restaurant and hotel sales are down is gas prices, utility prices and food prices are way up. People don’t have the discretionary income for frivolous day trips. No amount of advertising by the Sedona chamber is going to change that.
It’s time to build a balanced city economy for the future. All the retired and people working from home that have children that left Sedona are the type of people you want to attract again. It will take time. The previous city councils and administrations that thought Sedona only needed tourists killed the golden goose.
Reducing city expenses, city taxes and making Sedona a place families want to live instead of a tourist trap. Sedona used to have retired, people working from home, new age health related businesses and high end resort tourists. That balance, along with the unrivaled beauty drew me and many others to Sedona 30 years ago. A tourist only focus caused myself and many others to leave the place we once loved.
I would think it is at least 10-15 year project. You don’t rebuild a ruined reputation overnight.
Samaire Armstrong, having a young son will hopefully be more family focused. Jablow was part of the problem, he is the wrong choice to fix things.
Voting for either candidate is change so your comment is beyond odd?
Why did the Vice mayor run against the existing mayor? Because he wanted change. SMH
To the anonymous poster who was not brave enough to give their name:
Jablow voted with the majority on virtually every vote when he was on the previous city council that contributed greatly to the present situation in Sedona. Jablow was apparently never in favor of change unless he was absolutely forced by residents when he was on the city council. In what fantasy world do you think he will be in favor of change when he is mayor?
Jablow is the typical public employee that put this city and country in the shape it is in now. Joe Biden has been on the public payroll his entire life also. Jablow and Biden have a lot in common. Old white men way past their sell by date that should move over for new ideas.
YOU are the one beyond odd.
I was appalled by Armstrong’s comment in where she called out a city staff member by name – stating that “she will be the first to go”.
I have never seen this level of unprofessionalism exhibited by a candidate for elected office. Frankly, it speaks volumes to her ignorance, lack of experience, and her poor leadership skills.
As far as I’m concerned, she is not suited to hold any public office.
If elected, we can only hope that the majority of the City Council will keep her in check until she either resigns or serves out her term as a lame duck Mayor. Hopefully the former!
That was a surprise to me also R. Whitman …And her looking down at affordable workhouse housing calling it Section 8 and should be 30 miles out of town!
The new politics is to say the most outrages things, and lie non stop!
I was very shocked and saddened by such a pompous attitude!
@R Whitmen
The Sedona City staff member mentioned should be the first to go.
The Sedona staff member must have gone to some city paid junket where she heard presiding over a bigger budget makes it seem as if you are doing a larger job also. “Professional staff” my azz.
Citizens should not only mention incompetence in government but tar and feathers and being ridden out of town on a rail would probably go far towards government reform.
The only thing unprofessional are the actions of both Sedona City government and much of our national government. They should be mentioned by name every time they act against the voters interest.
How about the Sedona City manager getting a lavish car and phone allowance along with a huge salary? I think we should mention that also.
The only people that think names should not be mentioned are those in government when they are exposed in wrong doing.
Liberals make me laugh. Two busses into Martha’s Vineyard, a so called sanctuary city, and they call out the national guard.
On one hand some say Sedona should be a tourist town, on the other they want low income housing. Hey genius, tell me how many tourists want to tour low income housing?
Hey West Sedona Dave, do you want to live next to low income or Section 8 housing? Give your full name and address so your neighbors will know who wants to destroy their neighborhood, squeek up !
Well Mary C, Im within the 300 foot circumference of the Sunset lofts.And have been at all meetings pertaining to in. I find it to tall (27′) and ugly. It will take any views of Thunder Mt. for us. The last thing Im worried about is people who work in town minimum 32 hours a week. As you have no idea of the struggles for the majority of workers in Sedona.
Armstrong said in defense of her lack of experience that she is a fast learner…. in fact she is a “sponge” when it comes to learning
A candidate like that is no candidate
Would you go to a dentist or eye doctor who said I know nothing but I’m a “sponge” when it comes to on the job training?
She further stated in both debates that Sedona’s workforce could live within 30 miles of Sedona (which to me implies definitely not right in Sedona)
The bus she said is not working while in just a short time it has significant ridership and over time it will increase operations not only for tourists but for residents seeking an alternative to more popular trailheads