Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona News
    • Business Profiles
    • Opinion
    • Mind & Body
    • Arts
    • Elections
    • Contact
    • Cart
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home » Why The Sons of Liberty Fought the Revolutionary War
    Election Coverage

    Why The Sons of Liberty Fought the Revolutionary War

    July 26, 2018Updated:July 27, 201810 Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Place ads on Sedona.biz

    logo_electionBy Tommy Acosta
    (July 26, 2018)

    Think of two words that encapsulate the premise of the American Revolution; two words that led to the penning of the Declaration of Independence; two words that gave our founding fathers the reason, the will, the strength and determination to turn their plows into guns and force the British overseers out of our country.

    What are these two words for which the founding fathers fought and died for? Two words that inspired the brave men and women of America in 1776 to say no to “Mad” King George’s rule and unshackle themselves from the tyranny of the monarch and his army?

    That’s right. HOME RULE! The Revolutionary War was all about Home Rule. We could no longer allow an outside authority to determine our fate and tax us without representation. So we picked up our weapons, left our families and went to war for the right to rule our homes; for the right to rule our country.

    photo_tommyacostaThe ideal of home rule, of being able to determine our own fate, is ingrained in the fiber and psyche of America.

    Fast-forward to today and the recent effort here in Sedona by individuals seeking to surrender our local government’s right to Home Rule.

    Giving the state dominion over our city’s budget would be like giving the reigns of our country back to England.

    Home Rule is as American as apple pie. Messing with it undermines the foundation our country stands upon.

    If the anti-home rule candidates running in this election want to limit the budget to their specifications, then do so as representatives of the people rather than lap dogs of the state.

    These candidates should have the confidence in themselves to control the budget rather than have to rely on the state to do it for them.

    There are those who would argue that the state is simply imposing a budget ceiling and they are not controlling it. However, by setting a ceiling they also control how much we can spend on line items, forcing us to make painful choices between what we can fund and not, thereby controlling us in that manner.

    Most of the anti-home rule candidates running for the Sedona city council this election hope to do what’s best for the city, no doubt. These candidates can better improve their chances by dropping their reliance on the state to limit the city’s budget and rely on them selves instead.

    There are arguments that Home Rule allows the city government to spend money like drunken sailors and is the root cause of all our traffic problems.

    There are arguments that Home Rule is the lifeline that keeps our city and its environment strong and healthy.

    The arguments have been lucid and well presented by both sides.

    Beyond the scope of these arguments is the fact that Home Rule is the very reason our country came into existence. We are free today because our forefathers gave their lives to guarantee no one from the outside can ever rule over us again.

    Consider this when voting to keep the right of Home Rule alive or send it to its death.

     

    Place ads on Sedona.biz

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Tommy Acosta
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event

    August 3, 2022

    August Primary Election 2022 Early Ballot Update

    August 1, 2022

    Eeny Meeny Miny Moe!

    July 28, 2022

    10 Comments

    1. Sandy C. Schorr on July 29, 2018 7:13 pm

      I don’t know how I missed this. Mighty slick of you Tommy finding the one vulnerability with the anti-home rule campaign and going right in for the kill. Yup. Unfortunately, you are right. Who the hell is against ruling from the home. It’s a psychological thing and you’re exploiting it. Our side should have used the legal term rather than going against the catchy home rule phrase. I blame whoever is the political mind behind our effort for screwing it up. And the fight for home rule back in 1776 is not the same as the fight we are waging right now. Neither has anything to do with the other. And how come you fail to make any argument at all for voting for home rule other than the redundant one that it irks you because you don’t like the sound of vote “no” on home rule? Doesn’t it bother you the chamber and council are so cozy, along with the local paper, spending money like drunken rock stars? (I’m tired of the drunken sailors metaphor). I mean, doesn’t it bother you all this traffic, especially these days, clogging our streets from one end of our city to the other? Oh wait. You would rather hug a tree than drive. Our aim is to get rid of every incumbent except one, take over the council and shape this city into our vision of what it should be. We got money. We got support. We are done with the old guard. Vote No on Home Rule!

    2. Tony Tonsich on July 29, 2018 10:02 pm

      Home rule would be ideal with a frugal majority city council. There has not been a frugal city council for years.

      Lets take a possible future city council. Returning will be John Martinez and John Currivan. Possible newly elected council persons, Jessica Williamson, Scott Jablow and Janice Howes Hudson. Pick any other two, in this case it won’t matter. If you then take the tax and spend majority group of Martinez, Williamson, Jablow and Hudson, along with the blank check of home rule, you can count on more of what we have had the past four years.

      Are you willing to take that risk?

      If you vote yes on home rule, you are taking that risk.

      I can run the city with or without home rule. I can’t change things unless WE have a frugal majority on city council.

      No to incumbents and past government employees. No to home rule, don’t give local government a blank check.

    3. SFD Budget and Home Rule on July 29, 2018 10:59 pm

      Same thing, NO to unnecessary spending and a bottomless coffer mentality.
      The voters said NO to the Sedona Fire District multimillion dollar renovations request by a large margin.
      Say NO again to the Home Rule and get those over spenders out on all levels starting at the top.

      This article did nothing to tug at my patriotic heartstrings, quite the opposite. Did you think you were talking to a bunch of fools?

    4. Tommy Acosta on July 30, 2018 8:10 am

      Actually Sandy, I have this tiny-little Bonsai tree I keep with me in the front passenger seat of my car when I have to drive anywhere in Sedona. I don’t hug it. I pet it. (:->

      Like I said before, I think there have been good arguments from both sides of the table and I give kudos to those willing to run for office and devote their time to participating in the democratic process.

      I would not go as far as calling myself a Conservative but it just bugs me putting another level of government between us and our money.

      If we want to limit the budget then let the will of the people manifest trough the PBA (Permanent Base Adjustment) on the ballot or replace the council with people who want to limit the budget through their own efforts rather than relying on the state to cap it.

      Why the need for the state to be our nanny? We are grown ups and could do it ourselves.

      And Tony, it’s admirable you are running for office. It’s just that I think you would have stood a better chance of winning running on your own merits rather than dovetailing to the anti-home rule faction.

      As a veteran news reporter and editor in the Bronx in New York City for more than 20 years I have covered some really nasty election battles where fist fights and physical intimidation were the norm.

      It’s standard practice for incumbents to defend their records and challengers to attack them. What varies is the degree of animosity and contention.

      This election process in Sedona is all warm and fuzzy compared to those in the Bronx. For the most part the factions have been courteous and respectful to each other.

      I had hoped to stay out of this one but as a business owner and one supportive of tourism it’s important to me that we maintain a healthy economy and visitor numbers.

      Also, I find the concept of anti-home rule detestable for the reasons stated in my article. We don’t need an outside entity limiting our budget. Home rule is sacrosanct in my book.

      In the years I have known the present mayor I have found her to be honest, industrious and passionate about preserving and promoting Sedona. Never once have I suspected her of having anything less that the best intentions for our city.

      As an investigative reporter for many years I have a very sensitive nose for nefarious activities in the realm of the elected. The mayor and present council are clean in my judgement.

      I have known the chamber president for many years. In my opinion she too truly cares about Sedona and has done a marvelous job bringing people to our community and sharing the beauty of Sedona with the world.

      The present editor of the Red Rock News and I have had our differences during my tenure as editor of the Sedona Times. We have bumped heads more than once on various issues. Still, I have nothing but total respect for him.

      He is a gifted writer, an award-winning editor, honest and one whose pen people should not take too lightly. He is motivated by a passion for journalistic principles and he is ferocious in his quest for the truth. This is a dangerous combination of qualities to those who twist it.

      In closing, not for a second do I think I am talking to a bunch of fools, Mr. or Ms. SFD. Those who come to Sedona.biz to read and participate in the discussions are anything but that. These are concerned and involved, intelligent citizens who want what’s best for Sedona.

      The fact is the Revolutionary war was fought for home rule. Plain and simple. When you consider all the reasons for the war, those two words is what it all boils down to.

      “The foundation of Liberty rests upon our ability to rule ourselves–and it begins at home.”

      • Sandy C. Schorr on July 30, 2018 12:58 pm

        Ha! Ha! Hah Tommy Acosta. You are so funny. I hope your little Bonsai Tree dries up from lack of water next time you are stuck in Sedona traffic for 12 hours. We don’t need no tourists. We need No Home Rule to get rid of them. They don’t buy nothing, get in the way and mess up our trails. It’s time to get rid of them so we retirees can get back to living a normal life. Tourists are ruining Sedona. Our quality of life continues to go downhill. We need to put the brakes on the Chamber. It’s the only way.

    5. Franklin Craig on July 30, 2018 9:59 am

      Hay, if you want to know what Home Rule does for the people look at Cottonwood. Most of them make $200,000 and they want to rase city sales tax. Cost overrun on projects. That’s what you got to gain with Home Rule. State laws is to help people by restraining local government from running wild. I say no to Home Rule but some people don’t understand or vote.

    6. Warren on July 30, 2018 3:00 pm

      No, the two words that encapsulate the premise of the American Revolution were not “Home Rule” but F.U.

      Like the American Revolutionists, we against the Home Rule establishment are sick of their (mis)Rule and are raising a stalwart and defiant middle finger.

      • Tommy on July 30, 2018 5:06 pm

        Very clever there Warren but F.U. are two letters, not two words. And by the “stalwart and defiant middle finger” do you mean the state of Arizona? LOL Just having fun with this. Nothing personal. Write on!

    7. Dale on July 30, 2018 5:36 pm

      Having lived in Sedona for 25 years, I have seen many changes throughout those many years. I have voted for Home Rule everytime it was on the ballot but one of the many changes I have seen is a City Council and Mayor that are fiscally out of control and need to be stopped.

      Spending by the existing and previous councils has to be reset and the only way to do that is to vote NO on Home Rule in August and then increase the Permenent Base Adjustment to $36 million (which was last year’s actual spending) by voting YES on Permenent Base Adjustment in the mid-term elections. This will raise the State’s Permenent Base to $36 mil from the $24 mil that everyone is afraid of. By raising the base, NO city services will be cut.

      Mr. Acosta, I don’t know if you were ever in the military but as a Vietnam Veteran, I take your Revolution analogy as an insult. The lives lost in the Revolutionary War were sacraficed for our individual freedoms. Comparing that to Sedona’s citizens wanting to halt the runaway spending of our city council is not even close.

      Vote NO on Home Rule then vote Yes on Permenent Base Adjustment and be sure to vote out all of the incumbants so we can get some council members and Mayor who will listen more closely to the citizens of Sedona instead of catering to the tourists.

    8. Tommy on July 30, 2018 6:00 pm

      With all due respect for your service I have friends who served in the same war you did and they are staunch supporters of home rule.

      Local control trumps external control. If the voting public wants to elect officials who will be more frugal with the city’s budget, so be it.

      If they desire a Permanent Base Adjustment, so be it.

      But the concept of home rule has been defended through the centuries by those willing to die or kill for the freedoms home rule provides.

      My apologies if you feel offended but offense was not my intention.

    Paid Political Ad Paid For by Samaire for Mayor
    Paid Political Ad for Samaire Armstrong
    Paid Political Announcement by Samaire For Mayor

     THE MOMENT IS UPON US

    Dear Sedona,

    The moment is upon us. The time for a united effort to shift the focus back to our community is now.

    The ability to thrive in our community, our environment, our workforce, and the tourist industry, is entirely possible because we have all the resources needed for success.

    Still, we need a council that isn’t afraid to ask the hard questions, that makes decisions based on data and facts, and through discussion, rather than moving and voting in group unison as they so regularly do.

    This is my home. I have been a part of the Sedona community for 28 years. I witnessed the road debacle, the lack of planning, the city circumventing the local businesses ability to thrive, while making choices to expand the local government and be in direct competition with private industry.

    I am a unique candidate because unlike the incumbents, I don’t believe the government should expand in size, nor in operations, nor would I attempt to micromanage every aspect of our community.

    City government should stay in its lane and allow the competitive market of local private industry to prosper. And it should defend our community from corporate takeover and infiltration of our town.

    I do not agree that we should sign onto International Building Codes and regulations by signing Sedona up to the ICC. It is imperative that we remain a sweet, rural community.

    Where are the arts? Where is this organic thriving element that we allege to be animated by. Where is our culture? Where is our community?

    The discord between the decision making process and the desires of the community have never been more clear. It has been nearly a decade in the making.

    It is time for a new era of energy to take charge. An energy that is reflective in the ability to succeed rather than be trapped in out of date consciousness.

    It has been a great honor meeting with each of you. I hear your concerns over the insane and out of control spending and I echo them. A budget of $105,000,000 in a town of 9700 residents is completely unacceptable. A parking structure (that looks like a shoe box) originally slated to cost 11 million, now projected to cost 18 million, is incomprehensible. Especially, considering there is no intention of charging for parking.

    For those who are concerned that I lack the political experience within our established system- that is precisely what Sedona needs… Not another politician, but instead a person who understands people, who listens to the voices within the community, and who will act in service on their behalf with accountability, for the highest good of Sedona. What I am not, will prove to be an asset as I navigate the entrenched bureaucracy with a fresh perspective. Business as usual, is over.

    Creative solutions require new energy.

    Every decision that is made by our local government, must contemplate Sedona first.

    • Does this decision benefit the residents?
    • Does this decision benefit the local businesses?
    • Does this decision actually help the environment?
    • Will this decision sustain benefit in the future, or will it bring more problems?

    What we have now is a city government that expands to 165 employees for 9700 residents. Palm Desert has 53,000 residents and 119 city employees. Majority of our city department heads are not even in town. I find this problematic.

    Efforts towards championing in and courting new solutions for our medical needs are imperative. We are losing our doctors. We must encourage competition with other facilities rather than be held hostage by NAH, who clearly have their own set of dysfunctions.

    We must remember that so many move to Sedona for its beauty, hiking, and small town charm. Bigger, faster, and more concrete does not, in broad strokes, fit the ethos of Sedona.

    The old world must remain strong here in balance, as that is what visitors want to experience. Too many have noted that Sedona has lost its edge and charm.

    As Mayor I will preserve the rural charm of our community, and push back against the urbanization that is planned for Sedona.

    As mayor I will make it a priority to create opportunities to support our youth.  After school healthy, enriching programs should be created for our kids, and available to the Sedona workforce regardless of residency and regardless of school they belong to.

    As Mayor, I will create an agenda to deliberately embody the consciousness of our collective needs here, allowing private industry to meet the needs of our community rather than bigger government.

    I hope to have your vote on Aug 2nd. I am excited and have the energy to take on this leadership role with new eyes, community perspective, and the thoughtful consciousness that reflects all ages of the human spectrum.

    Thank you deeply for your consideration.

    Sincerely,

    Samaire Armstrong

    Sedona elections
    Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    Ready to Rumble

    By Tommy Acosta
    In the Blue Corner stands Scott Jablow and in the Red Corner of the ring stands Samaire Armstrong, ready to rumble to the bitter end in their fight to become the next Sedona mayor. Jablow weighs in with 1,137 primary election votes (36.13%) under his belt, having wielded his advantage as sitting Sedona City Council vice-mayor to his favor. He brings his years of serving in that capacity into the fray and waged a solid fight in his campaign to make it to the run-off. Armstrong, however withstood a blistering smear campaign from the other opposing candidates and their supporters to make it to the final bout with 967 votes under her belt (30.73%), an amazing feat for a political newcomer. Unfortunately, for the other two candidates, Kurt Gehlbach and sitting mayor Sandy Moriarty, neither put up enough of a fight to make it to the championship bout. Read more→
    Recent Comments
    • Laurenza on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    • Joan Mansfield on James Ratliff Gallery in Sedona Exhibits the Interpretative Art of Christine DeSpain Schroeder
    • RJ on Eeny Meeny Miny Moe!
    • Mary Wright on Eeny Meeny Miny Moe!
    • OMMITTE on Eeny Meeny Miny Moe!
    Categories
    © 2022 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.