Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona News
    • Business Profiles
    • Opinion
    • Mind & Body
    • Arts
    • Elections
    • Gift Shop
    • Contact
    • Advertise
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home » What Is vs. What Could Be: Candidates Present Different Visions
    Sedona

    What Is vs. What Could Be: Candidates Present Different Visions

    October 17, 20221 Comment
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp

    By Tommy Acosta

    Sedona, AZ Election News: My favorite line from the Movie Wag The Dog was “Don’t change horses mid-stream.”

    This is what I picked up from the last debate between Scott Jablow and Samaire Armstrong, where Joblow more or less declared that he was going to continue the many programs the city initiated or will initiate, if he is elected mayor.

    He had facts, data and reported his work to the Sedona citizens in attendance. He stood by the current trajectory of the council and defended its record. He appeared confident and resolute in his opinions.

    Armstrong took another road. Where he reported on the present state of the city, Samaire weaved a vision for the future.

    He represented what the city is and she what the city could be.

    Scott was on the ball. She was sharp and ready.

    His performance in this debate much better than before. She was smoother and more polished than her first.

    He had the answers ready in hand and delivered a solid summation of where the city stands, sharing his qualifications. 

    She spoke eloquently of things the city should be striving for.  She shared ideas and concerns reflecting her hope for a beautiful new Sedona where everyone has a say and work together for the benefit of all.

    Jablow seemed more relaxed through this debate. He delivered a few zingers early on and was rewarded in kind by his opponent later on.

    He ended his closing remarks with flourish garnering louder applause than in his previous debate.

    Armstrong maintained her poise throughout the debate, creatively navigating questions only years of service in city government could have prepared her for.

    The pressure had to be immense considering it was the second time in her life she had been involved in a public debate.

    At all times she remained focused on her vision for the future, while politely thrashing the past and present performance of the council over the last decade.

    The debate was a poignant example of what happens when you pit the old guard against the new one.

    Sedona Gift Shop

    One will defend what they have done while the other will denigrate it. And this is true not just in politics, but business as well.

    There were approximately 200 people present in the Performing Ars Center theatre, transfixed throughout the debate.

    The moderator held a tight a rein on the candidates, quelling any arguments between the two that had the potential to be heated.

    There was a hot-mike moment though, when it appeared Armstrong accused Jablow of having prepared answers for the debate. Candidates were not supposed to know beforehand what the questions were going to be.

    One thing for sure, the election is packed with emotion with not only with the candidates passionate about what they believe is best for the city but citizens vehemently opposing candidates they don’t like.

    There are many in the community who have expressed disdain for one candidate or the other depending on whose side they were.

    On stage one could feel the animosity of the candidates towards each other, each statement and response electrified bt their emotions.

    If Jablow wins, score one for those who believe in consistency and experience.

    If Samaire wins, score one for those who strive for a new future, want fresh ideas and believe in the energy of  youth.

    It’s an exciting time for Sedona. The town is at a crossroads. There is a path for it going forward, but no one can be certain, the path they choose is the right one.

    The economy, high gas prices and lack of marketing is costing the town much right now. People who hate traffic are enjoying a reprieve while businesses are watching their profits dwindle in tune to shrinking tourism.

    One can assume that the actions of the past failed to meet the actualities of the future, and something must to be done now to fill that gap.

    Jablow or Armstrong?

    The call is now yours.

     

    1 Comment

    1. West Sedona Dave on October 17, 2022 9:30 am

      Jablow or Armstrong?
      Ok, lets look at Armstong shall we?

      How is she going to address traffic concerns? She dosent want public transportation. Offers no solution.

      Workforce housing? She calls it section 8 and dosent want them living in Sedona. ” wants then 30 miles away”

      Short term rentals? Said city should of fought it 5 years ago. ( didnt acknowledge the City of Sedona and 3 other cities in the whole state were the only cities that didnt allow it) She has said nothing about a plan?

      So Tommy instead of writing to write I would appreciate looking at the facts and the solutions they offer.


    The Symbolism of Jan. 6

    By Tommy Acosta
    Don’t mess with symbols. Just ask author Dan Brown’s character Robert Landon. The worth of symbols cannot be measured. Symbols make the world-go-round. Symbols carry the weight of a thousand words and meanings. Symbols represent reality boiled down to the bone. Symbols evoke profound emotions and memories—at a very primal level of our being—often without our making rational or conscious connections. They fuel our imagination. Symbols enable us to access aspects of our existence that cannot be accessed in any other way. Symbols are used in all facets of human endeavor. One can only feel sorry for those who cannot comprehend the government’s response to the breech of the capital on January 6, with many, even pundits, claiming it was only a peaceful occupation. Regardless if one sees January 6 as a full-scale riot/insurrection or simply patriotic Americans demonstrating as is their right, the fact is the individuals involved went against a symbol, and this could not be allowed or go unpunished. Read more→
    Recent Comments
    • Blair C Mignacco on SB1100 Would Increase the Allowable Weight of OHVs
    • Jon Thompson on SB1100 Would Increase the Allowable Weight of OHVs
    • JB on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    • Sean Dedalus on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    • JB on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    Categories
    © 2023 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.