Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona News
    • Business Profiles
    • Opinion
    • Mind & Body
    • Arts
    • Elections
    • Contact
    • Cart
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home » Watch Your Language!
    Dr. Marta Adelsman

    Watch Your Language!

    September 12, 2018Updated:September 11, 20181 Comment3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Place ads on Sedona.biz

    By Dr. Marta Adelsman
    Life Coach in Communication and Consciousness
    www.DrMartaCoach.com
    (September 12, 2018)

    photo_martaadelsmanYou may have heard how I-messages or I-statements, when you use them in your conversations, serve those conversations.  “What,” you may ask, “is an I-message?”

    I-messages or I-statements happen when you talk about your own feelings, beliefs, or values.  They come in handy when you want to give constructive criticism or to settle conflicts. You-statements, on the other hand, focus on the person you’re speaking to. 

    For example, “You communicated poorly when you said that.” 

    This can sound blaming or accusatory, arousing a person’s defenses.  Converting this statement to an I-message, you can say, “I had a hard time understanding what you just said.”

    Marshall Rosenberg, in his book, Nonviolent Communication, tells how to use I-messages in a masterful way without inflammatory language.  He shares four steps to help resolve dissatisfaction or disputes in relationships.  When you practice these four steps consistently, you infuse your conversations with peace and healing.

     

    1. Observation.  State what you see or hear, just the facts, like “When I come home and see the dirty dishes in the sink…”
    2. Feelings.  “I feel disappointed (or angry or frustrated).” At this point, avoid slipping into hidden you-messages, like, “I feel imposed on.”  This implies a you-message (you are taking advantage of me by imposing on me) and, unless you live with a saint, it may stir up the person’s defenses.
    3. Need. “…because it doesn’t meet my need for [an orderly kitchen, or being partners together in keeping the house clean, or to feel loved.” Giving information about your observation, feelings and need communicates completely and thoroughly, leaving little question about what you want to say.
    4. Request.  “Would you be willing to do the dishes right away instead of leaving them in the sink?”  Then be open to either a yes or no response. In this step, if you expect only an affirmative answer, your request could carry the energy of a demand.  Demands elicit defensive responses.  A “no” response presents you with other choices by which you can meet your need.

    Because most of us have never been taught this way of communicating, at first it takes practice.  Write down the four steps as they apply to your situation. Then practice them in front of a mirror until they flow, one after the other.  If you need more practice, ask a friend to listen to you. When you’re confident you can deliver the statements freely and smoothly, then talk to the person to whom they apply.

    If you need support, call me for an appointment!

    Place ads on Sedona.biz

    Scott mayor
    samaireformayor
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Sedona.biz Staff

    Related Posts

    When You Disagree About Pandemic Guidelines
    (and anything else)

    June 17, 2020

    Stuck Indoors: 3 Steps to Pandemic Harmony

    May 6, 2020

    The Meaning of a Pandemic

    March 22, 2020

    1 Comment

    1. David R. McCain on September 13, 2018 9:30 am

      Hi Marta:

      Thanks for the article! I’m a Compassionate (Nonviolent) Communication trainer and consultant in Flagstaff. Glad to hear that you’re sharing the process as a coach in Sedona. I don’t see a phone number for you and your website appears to be down so I’m leaving a message hear.

      I’m always excited to see others sharing the “good news” of CC/NVC and I wish you the very best!

      Dave
      DavewithHeart@gmail.com

    Paid Political Ad Paid For by Samaire for Mayor
    Paid Political Ad for Samaire Armstrong
    Paid Political Announcement by Samaire For Mayor

     THE MOMENT IS UPON US

    Dear Sedona,

    The moment is upon us. The time for a united effort to shift the focus back to our community is now.

    The ability to thrive in our community, our environment, our workforce, and the tourist industry, is entirely possible because we have all the resources needed for success.

    Still, we need a council that isn’t afraid to ask the hard questions, that makes decisions based on data and facts, and through discussion, rather than moving and voting in group unison as they so regularly do.

    This is my home. I have been a part of the Sedona community for 28 years. I witnessed the road debacle, the lack of planning, the city circumventing the local businesses ability to thrive, while making choices to expand the local government and be in direct competition with private industry.

    I am a unique candidate because unlike the incumbents, I don’t believe the government should expand in size, nor in operations, nor would I attempt to micromanage every aspect of our community.

    City government should stay in its lane and allow the competitive market of local private industry to prosper. And it should defend our community from corporate takeover and infiltration of our town.

    I do not agree that we should sign onto International Building Codes and regulations by signing Sedona up to the ICC. It is imperative that we remain a sweet, rural community.

    Where are the arts? Where is this organic thriving element that we allege to be animated by. Where is our culture? Where is our community?

    The discord between the decision making process and the desires of the community have never been more clear. It has been nearly a decade in the making.

    It is time for a new era of energy to take charge. An energy that is reflective in the ability to succeed rather than be trapped in out of date consciousness.

    It has been a great honor meeting with each of you. I hear your concerns over the insane and out of control spending and I echo them. A budget of $105,000,000 in a town of 9700 residents is completely unacceptable. A parking structure (that looks like a shoe box) originally slated to cost 11 million, now projected to cost 18 million, is incomprehensible. Especially, considering there is no intention of charging for parking.

    For those who are concerned that I lack the political experience within our established system- that is precisely what Sedona needs… Not another politician, but instead a person who understands people, who listens to the voices within the community, and who will act in service on their behalf with accountability, for the highest good of Sedona. What I am not, will prove to be an asset as I navigate the entrenched bureaucracy with a fresh perspective. Business as usual, is over.

    Creative solutions require new energy.

    Every decision that is made by our local government, must contemplate Sedona first.

    • Does this decision benefit the residents?
    • Does this decision benefit the local businesses?
    • Does this decision actually help the environment?
    • Will this decision sustain benefit in the future, or will it bring more problems?

    What we have now is a city government that expands to 165 employees for 9700 residents. Palm Desert has 53,000 residents and 119 city employees. Majority of our city department heads are not even in town. I find this problematic.

    Efforts towards championing in and courting new solutions for our medical needs are imperative. We are losing our doctors. We must encourage competition with other facilities rather than be held hostage by NAH, who clearly have their own set of dysfunctions.

    We must remember that so many move to Sedona for its beauty, hiking, and small town charm. Bigger, faster, and more concrete does not, in broad strokes, fit the ethos of Sedona.

    The old world must remain strong here in balance, as that is what visitors want to experience. Too many have noted that Sedona has lost its edge and charm.

    As Mayor I will preserve the rural charm of our community, and push back against the urbanization that is planned for Sedona.

    As mayor I will make it a priority to create opportunities to support our youth.  After school healthy, enriching programs should be created for our kids, and available to the Sedona workforce regardless of residency and regardless of school they belong to.

    As Mayor, I will create an agenda to deliberately embody the consciousness of our collective needs here, allowing private industry to meet the needs of our community rather than bigger government.

    I hope to have your vote on Aug 2nd. I am excited and have the energy to take on this leadership role with new eyes, community perspective, and the thoughtful consciousness that reflects all ages of the human spectrum.

    Thank you deeply for your consideration.

    Sincerely,

    Samaire Armstrong

    Sedona elections
    Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    Ready to Rumble

    By Tommy Acosta
    In the Blue Corner stands Scott Jablow and in the Red Corner of the ring stands Samaire Armstrong, ready to rumble to the bitter end in their fight to become the next Sedona mayor. Jablow weighs in with 1,137 primary election votes (36.13%) under his belt, having wielded his advantage as sitting Sedona City Council vice-mayor to his favor. He brings his years of serving in that capacity into the fray and waged a solid fight in his campaign to make it to the run-off. Armstrong, however withstood a blistering smear campaign from the other opposing candidates and their supporters to make it to the final bout with 967 votes under her belt (30.73%), an amazing feat for a political newcomer. Unfortunately, for the other two candidates, Kurt Gehlbach and sitting mayor Sandy Moriarty, neither put up enough of a fight to make it to the championship bout. Read more→
    Recent Comments
    • West Sedona Dave on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    • Bosco Hurn on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    • SSuzanne on All Arizonans at Risk for Monkeypox; Stigmatizing Only Gives False Sense of Security to All
    • Rob Adams on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    • Laurenza on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    Categories
    © 2022 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.