Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona News
    • Business Profiles
    • Opinion
    • Mind & Body
    • Arts
    • Elections
    • Gift Shop
    • Contact
    • Advertise
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home » Letter to The Editor: “Smart” meter risks too great for liability insurance
    Letter to The Editor

    Letter to The Editor:
    “Smart” meter risks too great for liability insurance

    March 23, 2015No Comments
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp

    Healing Paws

    logo_lettereditorBy Nancy Baer
    SedonaSmartMeterAwareness.com
    (March 23, 2015)

    CAUTION!

    “The Electromagnetic Fields Exclusion (Exclusion 32) is a General Insurance Exclusion and is applied across the market as standard. The purpose of the exclusion is to exclude cover for illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionizing radiation exposure i.e. through mobile phone usage.” — CFC Underwriting LTD, London, UK agent for Lloyds of London

    So reads Lloyds of London’s recent response to the Canada Schools; districts, boards and medical health officers in response to a request for clarification regarding whether the insurance giant includes offers liability coverage for injuries, “directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise.” This would include the microwave radiation emitting from the commercial wi-fi transmitters and wireless devices in schools (among other public places). Canada’s Health Code and this country’s are practically identical.

    While Sedona Smart Meter Awareness knew about Lloyds written warning issued in 2010 to insurers which was shared with our public officials, having this policy reiterated in writing should raise red flags for those responsible for encouraging and allowing the unregulated proliferation of non-ionizing technology together with extortionary “opt out” fees.

    Sedona Gift Shop

    Most people are not aware that there have been two successful lawsuits in the U.S. (since the news doesn’t report it); both filed as Worker’s Compensation claims; one in 2007 and recently a nurse in NYC was awarded $4 million from the harm she suffered from exposure to the hospital MRI, etc., that effected the electrode implanted in her brain.

    British Columbia’s Coalition to Stop Smart Meters, Sharon Noble, was recently interviewed on the Goddard Radio Show about Lloyds’ recent restatement. Noble refers to Lloyds first taking its non-coverage stance to health effects from wireless exposure in 1998 when it refused any award to someone suffering ill effects from his exposure to a cell tower. The full interview is here
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dF-djNIb5Oc

    Ask yourself, if Lloyds of London acknowledges the risks are too great for liability insurance to cover health expenses, why aren’t our publicly elected and appointed officials not taking proper action to protect us?

    More – “School Boards Left On The Hook For Wi-Fi Injuries,” by Janis Hoffman
    http://thebridgenewsservice.com/2015/02/26/school-boards-left-on-the-hook-for-wi-fi-injuries/

    Comments are closed.


    City Council Weighs ATV Ban Ordinance Proposal
    By Tommy Acosta
    The Sedona City Council at its May 23, 2023 meeting took no action on a proposed ordinance that would ban all off-road vehicles from being driven on state-owned public roads or streets owned by the city. The ordinance, spearheaded by Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow on the premise that such vehicles pose a risk to the health, safety and welfare of the community, would impose heavy fines to anyone driving the ATVs or OHVs on city streets, including S.R. 179 and S.R. 89A. ATV rental companies have admitted that such vehicles are not intended or designed to be driven on paved roads, yet, in Arizona, they are allowed to do so under Arizona Revised Statute 28-1174 (4B). Opponents against the ordinance argued at the meeting that if adopted the ban would cripple the ATV rental industry in Sedona and cause much hardship to the owners and employees, as it would effectively, as written, destroy their livelihood. Read more→
    Recent Comments
    • JB on DORR Hosts Talk on Gun Violence Prevention
    • Mary on No Legal Traction on OHVs
    • Michael Schroeder on DORR Hosts Talk on Gun Violence Prevention
    • JB on Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow talks OHV Ordinance
    • JB on City Council Weighs ATV Ban Ordinance Proposal
    Categories
    © 2023 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.