Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona News
      • Business Profiles
      • Elections
      • Mind & Body
      • Arts and Entertainment
      • Sedona
      • City of Sedona
      • Goodies & Freebies
    • Opinion
    • The Sedonan
    • Gift Shop
    • Advertise
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home»Editorials/Opinion»Letter to The Editor»Letter to the Editor: AB 1767, Extension of Home Rule
    Letter to The Editor

    Letter to the Editor:
    AB 1767, Extension of Home Rule

    April 22, 20145 Comments
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp

    logo_lettereditorARS 41-563.02 Non-Compliance, 4-22-14 Special City Council Mtg. Agenda Item 3a

    By Jean Jenks, Sedona Resident
    (April 22, 2014)

    Hello Mayor Adams and Councilors,

    I.   According to Arizona Revised Statute 41-563.02, Elections for expenditures in excess of expenditure limitation:

    “Arguments for the proposed excess expenditures shall be prepared by the governing board.  Arguments against the proposed excess expenditures shall be provided by those in opposition.” 

    It is not lawful (see ARS 41-563.02.B.8) for the City to state in AB 1767 that “…any citizen is allowed to submit an argument supporting or opposing the Home Rule–Alternative Expenditure Limitation Option.”  

    While ARS 41-563.02.B.8 allows any citizen to submit an argument in opposition to the AEL (Home Rule Option), an argument in support from a citizen is prohibited.   Only the governing board (City Council), can legally submit an argument supporting the Alternative Expenditure Limitation.

    “Arguments for or against the proposed excess expenditure limitation [are] not to exceed two hundred words.”   

    It is not lawful (see ARS 41-563.02.B.8) for the City to state in AB 1767 that “The argument may not exceed three hundred (300) words in length” as the law limits arguments to two hundred words or less.

    Sedona Gift Shop

    PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:  THE PUBLICITY PAMPHLET FOR THE NOVEMBER 2014 AEL (HOME RULE) ELECTION MUST COMPLY WITH ALL LEGAL REQUIREMENTS OF ARS 41-563.02 INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE INDICATED ABOVE.

     II.   According to the City’s Resolution 2014-___ as proposed, “The Alternative Expenditure Limitation shall be adopted each year after a public hearing at which the citizens of the City of Sedona may comment on the proposed Alternate Expenditure Limitation.”

    What does this sentence mean?  I’m a little confused.  Will there be Alternative Expenditure Limitation (Home Rule) elections every four years hence at the time of the November election of the Mayor and Council, or will the November 2014 AEL election be the City of Sedona’s last?

    Sincerely,

    Jean Jenks
    Sedona Resident  

    Healing Paws

    This is an advertisement

    5 Comments

    1. Jean on April 24, 2014 7:34 am

      Update: The Home Rule election will not take place at the time of the November General Elections but during the August Primary.

      BTW, a review of Page 18 of the City of Sedona Comprehensive Annual Report for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2013, informs us that our Mayor and City Council spent $1,470,182 more than it took in.

      Total Expenditures = $17,622,427
      Total Revenues = $16,152,245

      • steve segner on May 5, 2014 12:27 pm

        Money is set-aside in special account for capitol projects. The city does not live from paycheck to pay check it has saving to pull from.
        And as you know the city has millions in special accounts.
        Just saying

        ss

    2. Jean on April 26, 2014 8:12 am

      A few days ago I received an email from the City Attorney on this matter. He is stating that I am “referring to the wrong portion of the statute” and further indicating that A.R.S. 41.563.02.B.8 does not apply to the City’s Home Rule elections.

      But wait a minute! City Hall was not adverse to this portion of the statute during the Home Rule Election of two years ago.

      In 2012 five of us chipped in together to pay the $250 FEE the City was extracting at that time before approval of an Argument for publication in its Publicity Pamphlet.

      On April 20, 2012, after the election was over, the City mailed the following (on official letterhead) to the individual who submitted our lone Argument Against:

      “Dear Mr. _______,

      Enclosed please find a check payable to you in the amount of $250.00. It was recently discovered by our Legal Department that, according to A.R.S. 41.563.02.B.8, we are unable to charge a deposit [fee] for arguments relating to the Alternative Expenditure Limitation. We are therefore refunding the deposit which was erroneously collected from you. We apologize for this oversight and thank you for your understanding.

      Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions or concerns.”

      Sincerely,

      [signature]

      Susan L. Irvine, CMC
      City Clerk

    3. Mike Schroeder on April 28, 2014 11:20 am

      I think we all learned a lesson. City needs oversight. Home rule – NO.

    4. Jean on May 6, 2014 11:03 am

      Although there’s some monies set aside in capital accounts for non-WW projects, it’s nowhere near enough. The City’s unsound financial management with regard to its long-term capital improvement plans is no secret. Underinvestment in infrastructure such as roads and drainage has been a problem.

      According to City Manager Tim Ernster: “In order to continue to address capital infrastructure improvements and pursue new capital outlay projects beyond 2017 [i.e., FY 2016-17], other funding sources and/or a debt financing strategy must be pursued.” Ref: Budget Work Session documents for the April 29 – May 1, 2014 City Council meetings.

      The single largest outlay in the proposed FY 2014-15 operating budget is the $1,248,500 handout to the (regional) Chamber of Commerce. This is over twice the amount of the contractual agreement between the City and the Chamber for the current fiscal year. No RFP’s or competitive bids were pursued, although requested time and again.

      Hasn’t City Hall’s mindset evolved to fund ever increasing demands for new and expanded handouts of taxpayer dollars to special interests within and outside the City limits–for use both within and outside the City limits? Organizations in the greater area should not be receiving favorable subsidies and City protection of their market share, thereby restricting competition and undermining productivity.

      Now to the City Manager’s mention of a debt financing strategy: The Arizona Department of Revenue reports Sedona’s per capita debt as $5,096.68. This is the 7th highest of Arizona’s 91 cities and towns.

    Baby Boomer Hippies
    Baby Boomer Blues
    By Tommy Acosta
    If you are a Baby Boomer and are reading this, STOP right now and click off the page because it’s one of the most depressing things I have ever written. But if you are in the mood to wallow in darkness and self-pity, read on. Baby Boomers, what happened? Has time so betrayed us, now, that we are but a decade or two away from finishing our stay here on this planet? What happened to those of us who grew our hair, protested against the unjust wars of our time and dominated three decades with the best music ever made and played? Looking back at videos of us at concerts, rocking to the Beatles, Stones, Yes, Prince, The Who, Metallica, Cream, Hendrix, Pink Floyd, Beach Boys, Kiss, etc., we look at ourselves and we are fat, old, or bald. Sickness racks us. Body parts are failing, and we are getting closer and closer to our expiration date. We had dreams. We thought we would bring peace to the world. We marched in great numbers on Washington against the killing war in Viet Nam. We wanted to bring an end to evil. And we failed. Miserably. Read more→
    Recent Comments
    • NDP on Baby Boomer Blues
    • JB on Bloody Stupid
    • OK boomer on Baby Boomer Blues
    • Michael on Bloody Stupid
    • JB on Bloody Stupid
    Categories
    © 2023 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.