Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona News
    • Business Profiles
    • Opinion
    • Mind & Body
    • Arts
    • Elections
    • Gift Shop
    • Contact
    • Advertise
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home » Letter to The Editor: AAG found SOCUSD violated Open Meeting Law
    Letter to The Editor

    Letter to The Editor:
    AAG found SOCUSD violated Open Meeting Law

    June 30, 20151 Comment
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp

    logo_lettereditorBy Matthew C Oskowis
    Parent/Advocate
    COPAA Member
    (June 30, 2015) 

    I received a letter from the Office of the Arizona Attorney General dated June 25, 2015 regarding the Open Meeting Law Complaint against Sedona Oak Creek Unified School District that I had filed against the District back in August 27, 2014. The complaint dealt with the two Special Public Meetings that the SOCUSD governing board held consecutively Monday, June 23, 2014 and Monday, July 14, 2014. These two board meetings were critical in the determination and selection of Scott Keller as the second principal at West Sedona School.

    According to the Arizona Attorney General the board violated the Arizona Open Meeting Law at both the June and July 2014 meetings. At the June 23, 2014 Special Public Meeting the board engaged in discussion of policy concerns and received background information from Superintendent Lykins regarding the employment of an additional principal at West Sedona School while in executive session. These discussions should have been done in the public session, although for whatever reason the board choose to not share the information with the public.

    At the July 14, 2014 Special Public Meeting the board again violated Arizona Open Meeting Law by engaging in discussions specifically regarding personnel matters involving Mr. Keller and other issues related to the reorganization of West Sedona School in executive session for over an hour. Again, the board chose to not have these discussions in public session.

    We can only surmise that the board’s choice to abuse the purpose of the executive session under Open Meeting Law at both meetings was to avert accountability to those who they are truly answerable to, the public. The actual reasons for needing to usurp Lisa Hirsch’s position as sole principal of West Sedona to this day remain elusive as some of the apparent reasons, test scores and teacher retention, appear to have had nothing to do with the leadership of West Sedona School.

    Going back to those governing board meetings in June and July 2014 it would appear that Mr. Lykins had deliberately presented additional information behind closed doors, not shared with the public, to cast such a negative light on West Sedona School it drove the governing board to act upon Superintendent Lykins recommendations. But the governing board then failed the public by not revealing the details of those discussions held in executive session in the public session, thus denying the public’s “right-to-know”.

    Sedona Gift Shop

    We may never know what Superintendent Lykins said to the governing board back in June and July 2014 behind closed doors, but the result was to create an apparent hostile working environment and divided the community who were perplexed regarding the justification for such an administrative maneuver. Looking back, some are not as perplexed as they believe Superintendent Lykins deliberately positioned Scott Keller as the co-principal to deliberately force Dr. Lisa Hirsch out and replace her with Scott Keller.

    A year later, we are back to a one principal at West Sedona School without as much as a cursory review of the initial justifications for the two-principal system and the governing board appears to want the whole unfortunate incident to be swept under the proverbial rug and just move forward. Is this the type of leadership that we want for our school? A governing board that appears to simply take the word of the Superintendent and act upon his recommendations without any follow-up or accountability for the effects of those recommendations good or bad.

    Sincerely,

    Matthew C Oskowis
    Parent/Advocate
    COPAA Member

    • Open Meeting Law Complaint against SOCUSD
    • Supplement to the Open Meeting Law Complaint Form

    1 Comment

    1. Warren on July 6, 2015 9:40 am

      @ Matthew C Oskowis — So the AG found that the board violated open meeting law. Is there any penalty?

      BTW, for the AG to take 10 months to figure this out is totally unacceptable. I have my own open meeting law violation complaint (against the ACC) filed with the AG. I lost patience after two and a half months and sent them an email with the subject heading, “Granma was slow but she was old.” I won’t go into detail but the subsequent response from the person handling my complaint was unreal. Hard to believe the guy finished school but he claims to be a lawyer.


    The Symbolism of Jan. 6

    By Tommy Acosta
    Don’t mess with symbols. Just ask author Dan Brown’s character Robert Landon. The worth of symbols cannot be measured. Symbols make the world-go-round. Symbols carry the weight of a thousand words and meanings. Symbols represent reality boiled down to the bone. Symbols evoke profound emotions and memories—at a very primal level of our being—often without our making rational or conscious connections. They fuel our imagination. Symbols enable us to access aspects of our existence that cannot be accessed in any other way. Symbols are used in all facets of human endeavor. One can only feel sorry for those who cannot comprehend the government’s response to the breech of the capital on January 6, with many, even pundits, claiming it was only a peaceful occupation. Regardless if one sees January 6 as a full-scale riot/insurrection or simply patriotic Americans demonstrating as is their right, the fact is the individuals involved went against a symbol, and this could not be allowed or go unpunished. Read more→
    Recent Comments
    • Blair C Mignacco on SB1100 Would Increase the Allowable Weight of OHVs
    • Jon Thompson on SB1100 Would Increase the Allowable Weight of OHVs
    • JB on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    • Sean Dedalus on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    • JB on The Symbolism of Jan. 6
    Categories
    © 2023 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.