By Tommy Acosta
Sedona, AZ — What the heck is going on? For the second time in just over a month, two massive vessels have collided in the middle of the ocean under circumstances that defy logic, probability, and conventional explanations.
On February 12, 2025, the USS Harry Truman—one of America’s most powerful and technologically advanced aircraft carriers—collided with a merchant ship in open waters. The damage was so extensive that the Truman had to be taken out of service for repairs, rendering it useless in a region where the U.S. military has been actively engaged in suppressing terrorist activities.
Now, on March 10, 2025, another inexplicable crash: The Stena Immaculate, a U.S.-registered cargo ship, was rammed while anchored in the North Sea by the Portuguese-flagged Solong. How does a stationary ship get hit in the middle of thousands of miles of open ocean by another massive vessel? What are the odds of two such incidents happening so close together? Astronomical.
And yet, here we are—two catastrophic collisions, crippling two key assets in U.S. military logistics.
Here’s where it gets even stranger. The Stena Immaculate was carrying high-grade jet fuel, the kind used for military fighter jets. So, let’s break this down:
- A U.S. aircraft carrier is disabled and removed from a volatile military zone.
- A U.S. cargo ship carrying crucial jet fuel is hit, set ablaze, and now out of commission.
- No clear explanation has been given by the U.S. military, no in-depth media coverage, and no official warnings issued to prevent further incidents.
We are talking about a major disruption to America’s military capabilities in a time of escalating global tensions. Without a fully operational aircraft carrier, its support vessels, or the necessary jet fuel to sustain aerial operations, America’s ability to respond to threats in Europe and the Middle East has been significantly weakened—and in a way that seems far too calculated to be coincidence.
Modern ships, especially military vessels, are equipped with some of the most sophisticated navigation, radar, and collision-avoidance systems on the planet. These systems make accidental collisions extremely rare, especially in the vast openness of the sea where there are no roads, no intersections, and no traffic jams.
So, how do two massive ships collide in each of these instances? What went wrong with their navigation systems? Why weren’t evasive maneuvers executed in time?
Some theories suggest electronic warfare is at play—a form of high-tech sabotage where enemy forces could be remotely interfering with navigation, radar, or even the automated control systems of these ships.
- Could a hostile entity be jamming or hacking GPS systems and making it appear as though ships are in different locations than they actually are?
- Could autonomous control systems be hijacked, causing ships to move unpredictably and crash?
- Could a new form of cyber warfare be in play—one that doesn’t need bombs or missiles, just sophisticated digital manipulation?
The implications are terrifying. If an adversary has figured out how to disrupt ship navigation, collision avoidance, or even override manual controls, then no vessel—military or civilian—is safe from engineered “accidents.”
What’s next? Are we going to start seeing drones, which the U.S. has been supplying to Ukraine, suddenly colliding in mid-air before they reach their targets?
Or worse—what if someone has developed the ability to remotely hijack these drones and turn them around mid-flight, using them against the very forces that deployed them?
There is precedent for this. Military analysts have warned about electronic warfare capabilities growing in sophistication, with nations like China, Russia, and Iran investing heavily in technology that can interfere with GPS systems, disrupt enemy communications, and even take control of autonomous military assets.
If these ship collisions are not accidents, then we are looking at a new form of warfare—one that is being tested right now in real-time, with real casualties, and real strategic consequences.
The most disturbing aspect of all of this? The lack of answers from officials.
No press conferences explaining these bizarre collisions.
No reassurances from military leaders about safeguarding navigational systems.
No investigative deep dives by mainstream media.
It’s as if this story is being swept under the rug, hidden from public scrutiny.
Why?
Is it because authorities themselves don’t know what’s happening and are scrambling for answers?
Or worse—do they know exactly what’s going on but don’t want to admit the U.S. military is under attack in a way it can’t defend against?
This could be the beginning of a shift in how conflicts are fought—not with open battles or visible attacks, but with invisible forces disrupting key assets in ways that don’t immediately look like acts of war.
If an enemy can disable an aircraft carrier, disrupt fuel supplies, and cause chaos without firing a single shot, they have already gained the upper hand.
And if we don’t start asking the hard questions now, we might never see the next attack coming.
Who is behind these incidents? What is their endgame? And how do we fight back?
One thing is certain: Somebody out there is testing the limits of electronic warfare—and they are getting bolder.
The question is: What happens when they escalate further?
And are we ready for it?
3 Comments
GPS is spoofable and unreliable. It is being rapidly phased out of use as obsolete by the US Military/Government for atomic clock systems:
GPS 100 times more accurate: Optical atomic clock could bring centimeter precision
https://apple.news/AHsKHwR5aThCnazA3tT9y7A
Magnetic North is constantly changing as well which presents challenges to traditional magnetic guidance navigation systems.
The Earth’s Magnetic North Pole Has Suddenly Shifted Towards Siberia, And Scientists Have Questions
https://apple.news/A-M47Fv4-QV6Xer8ISDhMnA
These appear to be accidents to me. Oilers and sometimes commercial shipsoften have no one on the bridge at night for one thing. For another goggle/GPS relies on the rules of the road for ships headed for each other. So a ship may not move when it has the right of way and the other ship has no one on the bridge.Sounds impossible – it’s not. A few years ago the US Navy went through a retraining process o for its Officers od the Deck Underway.
Just saying that considering the nuclear sensitivity of the Truman would warrant non stop vigilance for unmanned ships heading toward them in a manner that permits time to maneuver out of the way.
Russia, China, N Korea and many other countries shut down their tracking transponders and go dark on the high seas. US Naval vessels with the exception of some tenders and transports have the equipment to see them when they are within radar/sonar range so there really should be no accidents involving them if the crew is doing their jobs and maintaining vigilance.
Not much a large vessel like the Truman can do on its own if a smaller faster vessel is used as a suicide attack ship as was the case with the USS Cole. Which is why the navy maintains swift type fast attack boats manned by Marines and SEALs to patrol around them to run interference for them. They also try depending upon weather to maintain armed aircraft in the skies overhead to run interference in the air and on the surface (sometimes sub surface).