Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona
      • Steve’s Corner
      • Arts and Entertainment
      • Bear Howard Chronicles
      • Business Profiles
      • City of Sedona
      • Elections
      • Goodies & Freebies
      • Mind & Body
      • Sedona News
    • Opinion
    • Real Estate
    • About
    • The Sedonan
    • Advertise
    • Sedona’s Best
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home»Editorials/Opinion»Letter to The Editor»Letter to The Editor: Arizona Supreme Court Denies Review of ACC “Smart” Meter Decision
    Letter to The Editor

    Letter to The Editor: Arizona Supreme Court Denies
    Review of ACC “Smart” Meter Decision

    April 28, 2019No Comments
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp

    Information & Perspective by Warren Woodward
    (April 28, 2019)

    logo_lettereditorYesterday I received notice that the Arizona Supreme Court denied my Petition for Review of the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (ACC) “smart” meter decision made in the last APS rate case. Among other things, that “smart” meter decision allows APS to charge customers who refuse “smart” meters an extortion fee, and it completely disallows solar and commercial customers to refuse a “smart” meter when in the past they always could.

    Sedona Gift Shop

    My Petition for Review also challenged the inherent discrimination of two other aspects of the APS rate case. One was the so-called “90-day trial period” whereby new APS customers cannot take the regular R-Basic rate for 90 days but instead have to be on a Demand or Time Of Use rate. Another was the so-called “grandfathering” of APS’s R-Basic Large rate, which is no longer available to customers even though some customers are still on it. Read More→

    Healing Paws

    This is an advertisement

    Comments are closed.

    Council Slams the Brakes on Flock Surveillance in Sedona
    Video capture of Sedona resident expressing his views on Sedona’s spy cameras

    By Tommy Acosta

    The Sedona City Council through a majority consensus voted 5–1 at its Wednesday, August 13, special meeting, to temporarily shelve a controversial auto license-reading surveillance program, with council members  Melissa Dunn, Kathy Kinsella  Brian Fultz,  Derek J. Pfaf and Pete Furman giving a thumbs down,  and Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow supporting the cameras.

    Read more→

    The Sedonan
    House of Seven Arches
    Need More Customers?
    Bear Howard Chronicles
    Humankind
    Tlaquepaque
    Verde Valley Wine Trail
    Recent Comments
    • Kimberly on My Son is Innocent
    • JB on My Son is Innocent
    • JB on A Nation of Immigrants on a Path to Self-Immolation
    • Cameron Murrin on My Son is Innocent
    • Lynnda on My Son is Innocent
    • Jill Dougherty on Walk Away, Hamas — Save Gaza City
    • Jake Young on My Son is Innocent
    • Andrea Smith on My Son is Innocent
    • Mauricio Alves on My Son is Innocent
    • TJ Hall on A Nation of Immigrants on a Path to Self-Immolation
    • Jill Dougherty on A Nation of Immigrants on a Path to Self-Immolation
    • Malia Sonn on My Son is Innocent
    • Kamran on My Son is Innocent
    • Amari Sonn on My Son is Innocent
    • D. Morgan on My Son is Innocent
    Archives
    The Sedonan
    © 2025 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.