Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    • Home
    • Sedona News
    • Business Profiles
    • Opinion
    • Mind & Body
    • Arts
    • Elections
    • Contact
    • Cart
    Sedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde ValleySedona.Biz – The Voice of Sedona and The Verde Valley
    Home » A River for the Future: Will We Have One?
    Watershed

    A River for the Future: Will We Have One?

    February 1, 2015No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Ed Wolfe
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Reddit WhatsApp
    samaireformayor
    Place ads on Sedona.biz

    logo_verde_river_basin_partnershipBy Ed Wolfe, Ph.D.

    Verde Valley AZ (February 1, 2015) – The beginning of a new year is a good time to relish the wonder of living here in northern Arizona.  Among its joys are our Verde River and its flowing tributaries in the Verde Valley—Oak Creek, Wet Beaver Creek, and West Clear Creek—all, for now, flowing year-round.  Some grew up close to these flowing streams.  Others were drawn here to enjoy them, the green riparian forest along their banks, the fish, birds, and other wildlife that depend on these riparian corridors for survival.   These continually-flowing streams provide recreation and water for irrigation in the Verde Valley.  They support tourism and real-estate values here and are a critical source of water for the Phoenix area.  These rare and vital green ribbons of life in a desert state are a wonderful gift, and they are, importantly, the very heart of the Verde Valley lifestyle.

    photo_edwolfeSadly, year-round flow of the Verde River and its flowing tributaries won’t survive over the long run without substantial change in how we manage our water resources within the Verde River Basin.  Many thousands of wells that provide virtually all of the water for our domestic, municipal, and industrial use in the Verde River Basin pump from the groundwater basins that underlie Prescott, Chino Valley, part of Prescott Valley, the Verde Valley, the Big Chino and Williamson Valleys.  The natural groundwater outflow from these same basins, on which year-round flow of the Verde and its tributaries in the Verde Valley depends, is being reduced by pumping that began in the mid-20th century and has continually increased (by 2011 there were more than 18,000 registered wells in these groundwater basins). 

    The groundwater in these basins is slowly moving to the Verde River and feeds the river.  It is well understood that pumping from wells in these groundwater basins will eventually reduce the groundwater contribution to the river by approximately the rate at which the groundwater is pumped.  The inevitable consequence is the eventual loss of year-round flow, leading to a river that, like so many others in Arizona, flows only in response to runoff from storms or snowmelt.

    The fate of Del Rio Springs is a well-known local example of depletion and loss of stream flow as a consequence of groundwater pumping.  Del Rio Springs is located on Little Chino Wash (now a dry wash that flows only temporarily) within the northern part of the Town of Chino Valley.  It was a magnificent perennial spring complex at which the first Arizona Territorial Capitol was established in 1863.  For decades beginning in the late 19th century the Santa Fe Railroad hauled tank cars of Del Rio Springs water to Seligman, Williams, Winslow, and the south rim of the Grand Canyon.  Dairy products from Del Rio Ranch supplied Fred Harvey’s tourist enterprises along the Santa Fe rail line from Chicago to Los Angeles.   Perennial streamflow was continuous from Del Rio Springs to the Verde River; in effect, Del Rio Springs was the head of the Verde River.  Now the ground water discharging at Del Rio Springs is approximately 10 percent of the discharge in the early 1940s, and the Arizona Department of Water Resources has predicted that springs will be dry by 2025.  Nearly five miles of perennial Verde River steam flow has been lost between Del Rio Springs and upper end of Stillman Lake in the upper Verde River Canyon. 

    The decrease of Del Rio Springs and loss of nearly five miles of perennial Verde River, owing to groundwater pumping, is a cautionary tale we can’t afford to ignore.  Simply pumping ever more groundwater to support an ever-growing population is a recipe for irreparable damage to our environment, our lifestyle, and our economy.  We are faced with the likelihood of a warmer and dryer climate and the unlikely prospect of our being able to find and afford imported water sufficient to support either a growing population or perennial flow of the Verde River.   Our Verde River Basin populace must develop and invest in locally-implemented strategies to protect our groundwater by augmenting it and/or by reducing our demands on it. There is little choice but to solve the dilemma ourselves, living within our means.   And, we can’t wait for a different, more convenient time to get started.  Now is the time!

    Ed Wolfe, Ph.D.
    Verde River Basin Partnership

    Place ads on Sedona.biz

    Scott mayor
    samaireformayor
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
    Sedona.biz Staff

    Related Posts

    Former Gov. Bruce Babbitt on Legislative Attempts to Protect Rural Water

    July 26, 2022

    Our Water: What the Science Tells Us About the Future

    April 25, 2022

    The Gila Adjudication: It’s All About Water Rights

    March 30, 2022

    Comments are closed.

    Paid Political Ad Paid For by Samaire for Mayor
    Paid Political Ad for Samaire Armstrong
    Paid Political Announcement by Samaire For Mayor

     THE MOMENT IS UPON US

    Dear Sedona,

    The moment is upon us. The time for a united effort to shift the focus back to our community is now.

    The ability to thrive in our community, our environment, our workforce, and the tourist industry, is entirely possible because we have all the resources needed for success.

    Still, we need a council that isn’t afraid to ask the hard questions, that makes decisions based on data and facts, and through discussion, rather than moving and voting in group unison as they so regularly do.

    This is my home. I have been a part of the Sedona community for 28 years. I witnessed the road debacle, the lack of planning, the city circumventing the local businesses ability to thrive, while making choices to expand the local government and be in direct competition with private industry.

    I am a unique candidate because unlike the incumbents, I don’t believe the government should expand in size, nor in operations, nor would I attempt to micromanage every aspect of our community.

    City government should stay in its lane and allow the competitive market of local private industry to prosper. And it should defend our community from corporate takeover and infiltration of our town.

    I do not agree that we should sign onto International Building Codes and regulations by signing Sedona up to the ICC. It is imperative that we remain a sweet, rural community.

    Where are the arts? Where is this organic thriving element that we allege to be animated by. Where is our culture? Where is our community?

    The discord between the decision making process and the desires of the community have never been more clear. It has been nearly a decade in the making.

    It is time for a new era of energy to take charge. An energy that is reflective in the ability to succeed rather than be trapped in out of date consciousness.

    It has been a great honor meeting with each of you. I hear your concerns over the insane and out of control spending and I echo them. A budget of $105,000,000 in a town of 9700 residents is completely unacceptable. A parking structure (that looks like a shoe box) originally slated to cost 11 million, now projected to cost 18 million, is incomprehensible. Especially, considering there is no intention of charging for parking.

    For those who are concerned that I lack the political experience within our established system- that is precisely what Sedona needs… Not another politician, but instead a person who understands people, who listens to the voices within the community, and who will act in service on their behalf with accountability, for the highest good of Sedona. What I am not, will prove to be an asset as I navigate the entrenched bureaucracy with a fresh perspective. Business as usual, is over.

    Creative solutions require new energy.

    Every decision that is made by our local government, must contemplate Sedona first.

    • Does this decision benefit the residents?
    • Does this decision benefit the local businesses?
    • Does this decision actually help the environment?
    • Will this decision sustain benefit in the future, or will it bring more problems?

    What we have now is a city government that expands to 165 employees for 9700 residents. Palm Desert has 53,000 residents and 119 city employees. Majority of our city department heads are not even in town. I find this problematic.

    Efforts towards championing in and courting new solutions for our medical needs are imperative. We are losing our doctors. We must encourage competition with other facilities rather than be held hostage by NAH, who clearly have their own set of dysfunctions.

    We must remember that so many move to Sedona for its beauty, hiking, and small town charm. Bigger, faster, and more concrete does not, in broad strokes, fit the ethos of Sedona.

    The old world must remain strong here in balance, as that is what visitors want to experience. Too many have noted that Sedona has lost its edge and charm.

    As Mayor I will preserve the rural charm of our community, and push back against the urbanization that is planned for Sedona.

    As mayor I will make it a priority to create opportunities to support our youth.  After school healthy, enriching programs should be created for our kids, and available to the Sedona workforce regardless of residency and regardless of school they belong to.

    As Mayor, I will create an agenda to deliberately embody the consciousness of our collective needs here, allowing private industry to meet the needs of our community rather than bigger government.

    I hope to have your vote on Aug 2nd. I am excited and have the energy to take on this leadership role with new eyes, community perspective, and the thoughtful consciousness that reflects all ages of the human spectrum.

    Thank you deeply for your consideration.

    Sincerely,

    Samaire Armstrong

    Sedona elections
    Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    Ready to Rumble

    By Tommy Acosta
    In the Blue Corner stands Scott Jablow and in the Red Corner of the ring stands Samaire Armstrong, ready to rumble to the bitter end in their fight to become the next Sedona mayor. Jablow weighs in with 1,137 primary election votes (36.13%) under his belt, having wielded his advantage as sitting Sedona City Council vice-mayor to his favor. He brings his years of serving in that capacity into the fray and waged a solid fight in his campaign to make it to the run-off. Armstrong, however withstood a blistering smear campaign from the other opposing candidates and their supporters to make it to the final bout with 967 votes under her belt (30.73%), an amazing feat for a political newcomer. Unfortunately, for the other two candidates, Kurt Gehlbach and sitting mayor Sandy Moriarty, neither put up enough of a fight to make it to the championship bout. Read more→
    Recent Comments
    • Wonda Jones on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    • Wonda Jones on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    • Andrea Smith on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    • Bosco Hurn on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    • Justin Case on Armstrong vs. Jablow: The Main Event
    Categories
    © 2022 All rights reserved. Sedona.biz.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.