We must also shift
our focus from getting money to a focus on getting the job done.
It means identifying
what actual outcomes we are really trying to achieve and then
looking at all the possible ways they might get done.
Many new
possibilities emerge in this kind of approach.
Getting money is only
one of them.
Finally, we need to
have a serious community discussion about the City's financial
situation and what residents want, don't want and how we might go
about achieving the want list.
So many other City issues stem from the growing financial problem
including when and how to sewer portions of the City, storm water
drainage problems, under-grounding utilities and landscaping along
Hwy. 179, safety improvements on Hwy. 89A in West Sedona plus maintenance of
City facilities like parks, streets and existing sewer system
components. Many of these issues can be addressed using the
strategies described above.
A second challenge is protection of our scenic natural environment.
The beauty and wonder
of our natural environment is what makes Sedona special.
Ensuring that the ban
on land trades and resulting subdivision sprawl remains a part of
the new Coconino Forest management plan and continuing to pursue a
National Scenic Area designation are important to that end.
We also need to work
with the Forest Service (our neighbor on all four sides) on things
like developing a garbage transfer station to relieve illegal
dumping on nearby forest land and continue to cooperate on City and
forest public access to prevent overuse.
And, we need to pay attention to provisions in
our Community Plan about protecting the beauty of our night skies by
pursuing more effective and imaginative solutions to safety than 76
streetlights on Hwy 89A.
We also face challenges about our water supply; the amount
available, how it is distributed and how we deal with effluent at
the other end of the pipeline. We need to step up
our water conservation efforts before supply and distribution become
a significant problem. We still have time to
do that but the clock is running.
We must continue to
work with surrounding communities, especially Flagstaff, about respecting our water source. Sedona must also
seize the opportunity to begin using our million gallons per day of
treated effluent as a resource to benefit our community rather than
as a liability to be disposed of. A constructed
wetlands system offers the most cost effective way to do that.
What is your stand
on lighting for 89A?
The issue should be about improving overall safety on west 89A, not
lighting.
The 76 streetlights
proposed from Dry Creek Rd. to Airport Rd. will improve overall
safety by less than one percent at a cost of millions for the
lights; millions of lost revenue to businesses during construction;
$150 thousand per year for the City to operate them; and light
pollution of our nighttime skies.
There are many less
expensive and more effective ways to improve safety such as lighted
on-demand crosswalks, medians, signage, lowered speed limits and
additional traffic signals. If it is safety we really care about -
and it should be - 76 streetlights are a poor choice.
What is your
position on part-time rentals?
Keep the ban on
short-term rentals in residential neighborhoods. Most homeowner's
associations ban them for the same good reasons: vacation rentals in
residential areas destroy the nature of the neighborhood and
community. They often compete unfairly with other commercial
vacation rentals by failing to report or pay the bed tax.
What’s your take
on the Fitch proposal for the Cultural Park?
It would have been
better to see and deal with the full plan and design for the whole
area in one piece rather than the bit by bit approach, but many
decisions have already been made by the current City Council and we
have to go forward from here.
There's not much
point in second-guessing nor is opportunity to change what already
approved. It's critical that Yavapai College have a workable
agreement about land and space on the site. The performance
amphitheater at the planned hotel is appropriately scaled for a
community of our size and I'm encouraged about its potential as a
community asset.
I would not approve
any further proposals or development plans of any kind until the
property is closed in escrow.
Having one firm
applying for the plan amendments while someone else actually owns
the property sheds doubt on the approved changes actually being
accomplished
How about
local-real estate taxes?
The City is already
deficit spending on our operations general fund and has been for
several years. This is not sustainable. Our debt has tripled in the
past four years and more is planned. We have growing unfunded
demands for sewering, storm water drainage, facilities maintenance,
street upkeep and highway improvements.
Still we keep hiring
more City employees, increasing the City budget and funding
questionable business ventures while knowing that Hwy. 179
construction will reduce our sales-tax revenues and long-term trends
may put them into permanent decline. Something is going to have to
give.
When we have taken the measures I've described in my answer to the
first question on challenges we are facing, to get maximum
efficiency from our current financial resources, I will take a
leadership role in facilitating a broad-based community discussion
about what our residents want and the various ways those wants might
be achieved.
Did you learn any lessons from your first run for
City Council?
Lots! Running for public office is like taking a semester of
college classes. You learn a great amount about the City, how things
work, problems and issues that you would never have reason to learn
otherwise, especially at that depth.
You meet huge numbers
of people and make many new friends in a much shorter time than you
would any other way.
You learn that many
people in our City - and probably most other cities - genuinely
appreciate anyone who will put themselves "out there" in an election
setting to give back to the community. And, you learn what it takes
and what it costs to win an election in Sedona.
What are you doing differently this time around?
I'm starting earlier,
building on the organization I had last time, and using the many
things I learned last time to be more effective in reaching all the
voters.
Where do you feel
has the present council dropped the ball?
There very definitely are areas where the
present council has not performed as well as it should, but I'm
running for one of the four-year seats on the City Council, not
against the present council. I won't get into negative campaigning
by being critical on specific issues.
Are you endorsing anyone for council?
I make a point of getting along and being able to work with
people who have very different viewpoints. I'm not a
member of any business organizations or special interest groups so I
can focus on representing and being accountable to all segments of
our community - and working with whomever is elected to achieve what
is best for our City.
To learn more about Cliff Hamilton, visit
his website at
www.SedonaForCliff.com.
Footnote:
1
Although the City's total principal debt obligation is $76
million, Mr. Hamilton calculated the total cost to the City over
the life of the debt (as far out as 2028) including interest to
derive $121 million. Mr. Hamilton notes that while some of
the City's debt can be repaid early, some cannot. He is
particularly concerned that the City will be paying
approximately $6.5 million in principal and interest each year
for the next 10 years; and says that the City is relying too
heavily on continued strong tourism to generate the necessary
revenue through bed and sales taxes to support these payments.
[Home Page]
[News Home Page]
[Back to Community Page]