|
 |
|
Greener Bottles: In response to consumer concerns, manufacturers are creating bottles from biodegradable plastics, such as these, said to break down in landfills more easily.
Courtesy of Tom Balla/Nature works |
The battle over bottled vs. tap
water
After negative media reports on the
environmental cost of bottled water, the industry responds with
greener strategies.
By Tony Azios | Correspondent of The
Christian Science Monitor
Medford, MASS. - For most of the past seven years, Kate
Daniel was "a fiend for bottled water." Believing that bottled water
was healthier and better tasting, the Tufts University junior would
carry along a bottle wherever she went.
But after she failed to identify bottled water in a blindfolded
taste test sponsored by a group called Think Outside the Bottle, Ms.
Daniel's confidence in bottled water faltered. "I felt slightly
duped," she says.
Even as bottled water companies continue to see increased sales,
the recent raft of negative media coverage and activist campaigns
against the industry has caused a product once seen as fundamentally
green and healthy to lose some of its luster. Now, brand-name
bottlers are scrambling to reposition their products by upping their
green credentials to fend off further consumer backlash fermenting
in churches, college campuses, and city halls across the country.
"All big business is under siege, and at this point it would be
remiss to not react to environmental concerns," says Marian Salzman,
an advertising executive with JWT Intelligence in New York.
By now, most Americans have heard reports that point to the
amount of oil it takes to produce and transport bottled water, in
addition to the masses of plastic bottles that are used once and not
recycled. But most American consumers don't seem to be changing
their habits.
Since 2002, the US market has seen an increase in bottled water
production of more than 9 percent per year, according to the
Beverage Marketing Corporation. After soft drinks, water has been
the second-largest commercial beverage by volume since 2003.
Production for 2007 is projected to be more than 9 billion gallons,
with revenues clocking in just under $12 billion.
Despite buoyant profits, critics say it is only a matter of time
before the tide turns against the bottle. Meanwhile, a chorus of
state and local governments, social justice groups, and college
students are turning up the heat on Big Water.
"There is no denying a growing degree of public consternation
towards the [bottled water] industry," says Liz Gary, a Boston
organizer for Think Outside The Bottle (TOTB), a campaign launched
by Corporate Accountability International.
In response to their detractors, some water brands are attempting
to revive their green images. For example, FIJI Water, the
second-largest imported bottled water brand in the United States,
recently announced plans to become carbon-negative by 2010 by using
renewable energies and offsetting emissions through
land-preservation projects.
"These companies are trying very hard, because being green in
2008 is not a political issue but a moral one," says Paco Underhill,
the author of "Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping."
Campus cleanup
Although one of the most targeted demographics for bottled water,
teenagers and young adults appear to be scrutinizing bottled-water's
impact. "Since [2006], we have seen interest soar from about 10
colleges with TOTB campaigns to at least 36 very active ones now all
over the country," says Deborah Lapidus, national campaigns director
for Corporate Accountability International.
She estimates that there may be as many as 100 more such "boycott
the bottle" groups at various stages of organization in the US and
Canada, with new groups forming monthly. In addition, roughly 12,000
people, mostly college students, have signed a TOTB pledge to not
buy bottled water.
It's enough to make producers of bottled water nervous.
After student groups at Boston College and Vermont's Middlebury
College persuaded their schools to terminate lucrative contracts
with bottled water companies, their student newspapers received
letters from the American Beverage Association (ABA) and Nestlé
Waters North America, reminding a generation of new customers that
they have worked to improve recycling while keeping an "on-the-go
society" hydrated.
But for Tufts students like Daniel, greener efforts may no longer
be enough. When she learned that as much as 40 percent of bottled
water comes from municipally managed water sources, and not the
pristine springs she imagined, she decided to seal the cap once and
for all.
"Clearly the ABA is threatened by this movement because they know
how powerful college students are," says Lizzie DeWan, a junior at
Tufts and cofounder of its TOTB campaign.
The International Bottled Water Association shot back at critics
in a press release, saying, "To single out this product as any more
polluting or dangerous than the thousands of others packaged in
plastic is to ignore the fact that today's society demands and
relies upon packaged food and drinks."
Money drain for city hall
City and state governments are looking at the economics of
banning bottled water. Citing environmental concerns and a
misallocation of resources, Los Angeles; San Francisco; Ann Arbor,
Mich.; and the state of Illinois have banned the use of public funds
to purchase bottled water for city and state functions, while the
mayors of Salt Lake City and Minneapolis have strongly urged
constituents to opt for tap water instead. In June, the US
Conference of Mayors adopted a resolution to bring attention to the
negative impact of bottled water and promote local sources.
While critics say such moves will have nearly no effect on the
volume of plastic waste, penny-pinching city councils see it as good
economics. In each of the two fiscal years prior to the 2007
ordinance, the city government of San Francisco spent just under
half a million dollars on bottled water for city employees and
functions, despite touting one of the highest-rated tap water
sources in the country.
"Considering that an equal amount of municipal water costs about
1/2000th the price of bottled water, it's a very foolish
expenditure," says Neva Goodwin, co-director of the Global
Development and Environment Institute, a Medford-based research
institute.
Water as a social-justice cause
Beyond campuses and city halls, the issues surrounding bottled
water are also being taken up by groups dedicated to social justice.
Sister Mary Ann Coyle sees the growing corporate control of water
worldwide as the privatization of a basic human right and an
increasingly scarce resource.
In 2006, Sister Coyle, a board member of the National Coalition
of American Nuns, introduced a successful resolution asking its
1,200 members to refrain from purchasing bottled water unless
necessary. Other religious groups, such as the grass-roots
Presbyterians for Restoring Creation, are taking similar campaigns
to churches nationwide.
Victoria Kaplan, organizing director of the consumer rights group
Food and Water Watch, says that she has observed a heightened
awareness toward bottled water issues that was absent even a few
years ago. "I overhear small children in the grocery store telling
their mothers not to buy it," she says. In response, beverage
corporations "are moving into high gear to successfully market to an
educated consumer," says Ms. Kaplan.
For example, Poland Spring, the Maine-based bottled water brand
owned by Nestlé, is attempting to appeal to "green conscious"
consumers with its new Eco-Shape bottle, which they claim uses 30
percent less plastic than the average half-liter bottle.
"We were getting a lot of calls from people worried about
recycling and what happens to the plastic," says Jim Ritts, a
consumer affairs representative for Nestlé.
The efforts are appreciated but aren't good enough for some
consumers. "The impact of shipping other communities' water around
the world when we can simply turn on the tap is reason enough to not
buy bottled," says Kaplan.
Recognized as one of the world's top trend spotters, Ms. Salzman
predicts that the future of bottled water will be localized, with
companies bottling water within a few dozen miles of major retail
spots – allaying some carbon emissions concerns while still
providing a sought-after product. "In the same way we have local
wineries, we will begin seeing more bottled-water companies based on
a low transport model," she says.
But bottled water's convenience and health benefits, perceived or
real, will ensure growing sales for the industry. Regardless of some
consumer backlash, "the bottled water industry is very safe and
people will continue to invest in it as an affordable luxury," says
Salzman.
Bottled water impacts
These figures for 2006 highlight the problems many associate
with the production of plastic bottles of water in the United
States.
•More than 25.5 billion plastic water bottles are sold each
year in the US.•
•More than 17 million barrels of oil (not including fuel for
transportation) were used in plastic bottle production.
•Bottling water produced more than 2.5 million tons of carbon
dioxide.
•It takes approximately 3 liters of water to produce 1 liter
of bottled water.
•The total amount of energy used to produce, transport,
refrigerate, and dispose of a plastic bottle of water may be as
high as the equivalent of filling a 1 liter bottle one-quarter
full of oil.
Source: Waste Management World, The Pacific Institute
[Home Page]
|