by Nate Hansen
SEDONA, AZ (November 6, 2009) -
I
hesitate to use the word “Eureka,” as it implies
discovery, specifically the discovery of volume when
Archimedes stepped into the tub to bathe and noticed
that the water rose due to the displacement from his
body. Then again, being unfamiliar with the near 70
lighting plans ADOT had ready for Sedona’s Highway
89A, why not, I might be on to something.
So … EUREKA!!
It just so happens I think I’ve solved the Great
Sedona Lighting Debate, or as I like to call it …
“This Little Light of NIMBY.” In all honesty, these
are more of a series of thoughts and not solutions.
But thoughts lead to solutions, and if they end in
failure, so what! Winston Churchill once said,
“Success is the ability to go from one failure to
failure without losing your enthusiasm.”
|
Sedona Arizona News, Jobs, Tourist Info, Classifieds, Forums - Sedona.biz
|
Unfortunately, for the “light ray naysayers,” it
requires me to shed some light on the issue. On the
other hand, I feel comfortable using only ambient
light so nobody needs to get upset about brightness.
And isn’t that just it? There is no
brightness. Instead, there is this irony of no one
coming to a mutual agreement. There’s not only no
light on the highway thus far, there’s no light at
the end of the tunnel. As a matter of fact, the mere
mention of lights has cast a dark cloud over the
community, especially when certain Sedona City
Council members treat ADOT, the owners of the
highway who are going above and beyond to work with
the city (need I mention the number of proposed
plans again?), with disrespect. [see Sedona City
Council transcripts]
But let’s avoid the politics. Politicking gets
people in trouble. Finger pointing that could lead
to eyes being poked, which causes me to see bright
flashes of light … which NOBODY wants. Politicking
gives people egos large enough to cast an eclipse
(See what I did here? Referring to light, sun,
blocked out). I’m going to skip the “facts.” Facts
and truth are subjective. Your truth is different
than mine. Facts are whoever has the microphone,
pulpit or soap box. That said, I’ll avoid my own
facts and stick to strict opinion.
Here are my thoughts to consider:
1. Sedona is a community with a large percentage of
seniors. Seniors have a more difficult time driving
at night. Lights are good as they help light up dark
places. Well-lit places prevent the elderly from
running anyone over. I probably didn’t need that
last sentence.
2.
Since Sedona is a community with a large percentage of
seniors, shouldn’t we take into consideration that
these people are usually in bed by 6:30 p.m. Should
it matter what goes on when it’s dark and they’re
asleep? I understand they probably don’t want to see
what I’m doing when they’re asleep, but I don’t plan
on doing it under a streetlight. I’m surprised some
people are willing to protest outside City Hall
during City Council meetings—it’s past their
bedtime.
4. On Highway 89A, there are intersections that have
crosswalks and others that don’t. One that doesn’t
exist yet citizens attempt to make—like the illegal
bike trails the Forest Service battle—is the sprint
from the Martini Bar to Olde Sedona Bar & Grille.
That scares the $#!% out of me. Add a few drinks to
the livelier crowd and that sprint is more of a
stumble through oncoming traffic from both ways.
You’ve seen the video game “Frogger”? Yeah, well
it’s in front of New Frontiers! My thought: why not
place lights that are motion activated?
5. Last thought. Let’s build pedestrian bridges every
couple blocks. I know it defeats the purpose of
having red rocks for scenery, but at least it
prevents a blood red highway. Of course, this is one
of those thoughts (like tunnels) that won’t fly,
which makes the public rethink the first three.
On a positive note, if Sedona Police Department were
to do a massive ticketing of the people who jaywalk,
maybe we could straighten out some economic issues.
Maybe we could raise enough money to build an
amphitheatre … oh, wait.
Archimedes was later able to apply his discovery of
volume to find out the density of objects. I don’t
think anyone needs science to measure how dense this
debate over lights has become.
Readers' comments
#1 Nate,
Love your keen insight ( and humor )
John D.