by Carl Jackson, Editor | Sedona.biz
Sedona, AZ - In the January 5, 2008 Associated Press article
written by Jay Lindsay entitled Cape Cod's rapid aging,
slow growth point to future problems,
it stated that "Since 1990, the Cape's median age has risen
about seven years, from around 39 to just under 46. Nationwide, the
median age (36.4) rose about half as much during the same time...[and]
about a quarter of Cape residents are over 65, compared to
about 13 percent nationwide."
The article points the finger at the Cape's booming tourism
industry and the rapid increase in second homes which have placed
home prices far out of reach of regular working people, leading to
an influx of rich retirees and baby boomers.
Sound familiar?
The 2000 Census for Sedona by the U.S. Census Bureau notes that
25.5% of Sedona's population is over 65. Sedona is at the same
crossroad as Cape Cod.
Don't get me wrong, I aspire to be a rich retiree; but
that doesn't mean I want everyone else around me to be one too.
In my mind, Sedona needs young, old, rich, poor, conservative, and
liberal alike to make it the interesting, diverse, and culturally
rich city I think we all
want it to be. We talk a lot about wanting to retain Sedona's
small town character, but how do we do it?
It's not going to be easy, not everyone is going to agree on
every solution, and it might cost us something. A small group
at the City's Housing Commission chaired by Linda Martinez is slowly
making its mark: affordable housing.
Affordable housing in Sedona will give young, entry level, and
low income people the opportunity to live and work here and this
will help create a more diverse population.
The Housing Commission has offered several solutions. For
example, the Sedona City Council recently approved the Housing
Commission's
affordable housing policy that provides
guidelines and offers incentives to property developers to encourage
the construction and retention of workforce housing in Sedona.
Another solution is for the City to purchase
property in Sedona and convert it to affordable housing.
Let's stop right there. I'm a banker by background, and
I'm not too keen on the City becoming a landlord and subsidizing the
fair market value of property in Sedona for a few affordable rental
units. I told you that not everyone is going to agree on every
solution.
At a recent Planning & Zoning Commission meeting, however, I
heard a solution that has a lot of appeal, and also some risks:
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs).
Currently the City of Sedona prohibits the construction and
rental of Accessory Dwelling Units, which are defined as small,
self-contained residential units, providing complete living
facilities for the use of one or more individuals, with permanent
provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation.
They are built on the same lot as an existing single-family home and
subordinate to the primary single-family dwelling unit.
The Housing Commission is proposing that the City lift this
ordinance and allow residents to construct and rent ADUs for greater
than 30 days (the City currently prohibits rentals in residential
areas for less than 30 days). The Housing Commission is also
proposing that the ADUs be at least 300 square feet but no more than
800 square feet.
Why is this a good idea?
According to a Sedona City Staff report by Audree Juhlin,
Assistant to the Community Development Director, "housing options
for Sedona’s workforce, youth and elderly is a growing issue of
concern. In Sedona, between the year 2000 and 2007, the median
income increased by 15% from $44,885 to $51,300. At the same time,
the median price asked for a Sedona home increased 206% from
$280,250 to $577,500. As Sedona’s housing costs continue to
remain high, our workforce is finding it increasingly difficult to
live in the community they serve. According to the Arizona
Department of Housing, to afford a median priced home in Sedona a
person must earn over $84 an hour."
Small ADUs rented for more than 30 days will allow Sedona
homeowners to earn additional rental income while creating
affordable housing for Sedona's workforce, and create the diversity
and small town character Sedona desires; and it won't cost the City
anything.
What are the potential unintended consequences?
ADUs would increase population density and neighborhood traffic.
Also, if the City of Sedona ever decides to lift its ordinance
prohibiting short-term rentals in residential areas for less than 30
days, ADUs could quickly become vacation rentals rather than
affordable housing. And who will rent these ADUs? Maybe
they'll be more retirees.
It's now up to Sedona to weigh the risks, and decide what it wants
to become: Cape Cod, or something else?
[Home Page]
[News Home Page]
[Back to Community Page]