Home
News
Arts & Leisure
Sports
Business
Opinion
Dining
Gardening
Travel
Classifieds
Jobs
Community
Events
Forums
TV Listings
|
|
Community
 |
Lights out in Sedona
Advisory Panel to make recommendations to Sedona City Council to
improve safety on 89A in West Sedona
by Staff Writer | Sedona.biz
Sedona, AZ - At the January 23rd meeting of the Highway 89A
Safety Advisory Panel, the committee of 13, led by facilitator Russ
Hanson, arrived at consensus that ADOT's proposed 76 street lights
along 89A from Dry Creek Road to Airport Rd would not be among their
recommendations to the City Council to improve pedestrian safety on
89A. About 20 members of the public attended the meeting and were
visibly relieved by the decision.
Charged with recommending short term and long term safety solutions,
the group did reach consensus to recommend to Council that, in the
short term, a traffic signal be placed at the Andante intersection
along 89A in West Sedona, that the speed limit be lowered from Dry
Creek Rd to Soldiers Pass Rd with additional enforcement measures
adopted including photo enforcement, that jaywalking tickets
continue to be issued (tickets were given out in 2007 for the first
time in 5 years), to purchase, with the help of Keep Sedona
Beautiful and their efforts, 2 or 3 more "Your speed is...." signs
to encourage drivers to slow down, that speed and pedestrian signage
be enhanced, that businesses along 89A be required to adopt
compliant lighting to reduce glare for motorists and crossing
pedestrians and that a public awareness and education program be
initiated.
For the long term, the group recommended that the 89A
corridor be redesigned and options including medians, bike lanes,
and targeted sidewalk lighting be part of the plan.
While streetlights along 89A were listed to be the first item for
discussion at the three hour meeting, Doug Blackwell, community
representative on the panel, suggested that, since ADOT had
completed their study of the Andante intersection to determine if a
traffic signal was warranted, perhaps that study could be the first
subject discussed.
ADOT's Chuck Gillick reported that the recent
study of the Andante area showed that the intersection of 89A and
Andante Drive does indeed warrant a traffic signal. “While the
numbers were close,” Gillick said, “ based on the development in the
area and given the history of collisions at that intersection, we’ve
decided to go ahead with the City as a partner to install a traffic
signal there.” The previous study of the area was done in 2001 and
Sedona’s population has grown by more than 15% since that time and
the number of tourists and businesses in the area has grown as well.
A traffic signal will take about 2 years to install, according to
Gillick, but the group urged ADOT to see how it could be done
sooner.
Several members of the public commented after the meeting that, if
ADOT had done a study of Andante two years ago when the first
discussions about the need to improve safety on 89A came up as a
result of several pedestrian fatalities in the area, the signal
might already have been installed.
Following the discussion of the traffic signal, the group moved on
to discuss lowering the speed limit to 35 mph from Dry Creek Road to
Soldiers Pass Rd. Gillick said ADOT had not completed the traffic
study yet, but it appeared that 35mph would be the recommended
speed. Sedona Police Chief Joe Vernier said he favored the 35mph
speed limit and has already been looking into additional enforcement
tools including photo enforcement. The group agreed that they would
recommend to Council that the speed be lowered to 35mph and would
support enforcement measures developed by the Sedona Police
Department. While the traffic signal might take up to two years to
install, the change in the speed limit could take effect 30-60 days
after Council review. Eric Levitt, City Manager, said he would also
like to see more of the mobile unit speed reminders around the city.
Each unit costs approximately $1,200.
Another issue raised by International Dark Sky Association Technical
Advisor Pete Strasser was the number of non-compliant lights he
observed from businesses along 89A, lights that produce glare for
oncoming motorists and crossing pedestrians. The group agreed to see
how compliant lighting enforcement can be improved by the City of
Sedona.
In the discussion about lights, there was no consensus to recommend
the original ADOT continuous roadway lighting proposal which was
approved 7-0 by the Sedona City Council in June 2007. The safety
advisory panel was formed at the suggestion of Councilman Rob Adams
as a result of citizen outrage at the decision by Council and after
Keep Sedona Beautiful board members did a presentation to Council on
alternatives to improve safety without sacrificing dark skies with
sky glow and light pollution. KSB's recommendations included a
traffic signal at Andante, lowering the speed limit, improved
signage and a public awareness program. Over 150 people showed up at
the August 15, 2007 council meeting to say "No" to 76 street lights
along 89A in West Sedona.
Cliff Ochser, owner of Evening Sky Tours and a community
representative on the panel, stressed the distinction between
darkness and visibility. He said, “The question of visibility is
about creating contrast.” The panel also agreed to explore the idea
of “points of conflict” lighting suggested by Doug Blackwell based
on his review of such lighting projects in California which has
eliminated continuous roadway lighting from their highways in favor
of more reflective and contrast producing methods of reducing glare
and improving visibility. Blackwell will organize a task force of 4
panel members (city manager Eric Levitt, ADOT Northern Arizona
Regional Traffic Engineer Chuck Gillick, community representative KB
Bren and community member Cliff Ochser) to drive 89A to identify the
"points of conflict" which might require some form of lighting or
another safety solution.
The panel will meet once more, on February 11 at 11AM, to review
their findings on points of conflict along 89A and to determine if
any additional solutions will be recommended to the City Council
which is expected to hear from the committee in late February.
[Home Page]
[News Home Page]
[Back to Community Page] |